Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2005 Oct;70(4):921–935. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.004

Table 3.

Results of nominal logistic regression of song types versus all context main effects and two-way interactions conducted on each bird separately1

Male
Terms O W P G T J
Time of day <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.947 <0.001 0.622
Singing state 0.056 <0.001 0.028 0.100 0.021 <0.001
Location on territory <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.103
Female presence <0.001 0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.121
Time*Territory --- --- --- --- --- 0.003
Time*Female --- --- --- --- --- 0.022
Singstate*Female 0.002 --- --- --- --- ---
Territory*Female --- --- --- 0.011 --- ---
df 22 25 18 16 24 18
N 1685 1299 910 1590 908 1145
1

Table shows P values of variables in the final model, significant terms indicated in bold.