Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Dec 14.

Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2005 Oct;70(4):921–935. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.004

Table 3.

Results of nominal logistic regression of song types versus all context main effects and two-way interactions conducted on each bird separately¹

	Male
Terms	O	W	P	G	T	J
Time of day	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.947	<0.001	0.622
Singing state	0.056	<0.001	0.028	0.100	0.021	<0.001
Location on territory	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.103
Female presence	<0.001	0.001	0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.121
Time*Territory	---	---	---	---	---	0.003
Time*Female	---	---	---	---	---	0.022
Singstate*Female	0.002	---	---	---	---	---
Territory*Female	---	---	---	0.011	---	---
df	22	25	18	16	24	18
N	1685	1299	910	1590	908	1145

¹

Table shows P values of variables in the final model, significant terms indicated in bold.