Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.01.005

Table 3.

Odds of preventive screening among Chinese Women in Seattle, WA compared to Vancouver, BC

City effect (Seattle compared to Vancouver)
Ever screened
Screened in last 2 years
Odds ratio 95% CI P value Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Screening mammography, 50–74 years old (n = 409)
Unadjusted model 1.2 (0.7, 1.9) 0.48 1.1 (0.7, 1.6) 0.76
Adjusted for demographic variablesa 1.5 (0.9, 2.8) 0.14 1.1 (0.7, 1.7) 0.78
Adjusted for all demographic and health care access variablesb 1.6 (0.7, 3.8) 0.26 1.0 (0.5, 1.9) 0.91
PAP Testing, 20–69 years old (n = 973)
Unadjusted model 1.2 (0.9, 1.7) 0.25 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) 0.17
Adjusted for demographic variablesa 1.6 (1.1, 2.3) 0.02 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) 0.01
Adjusted for all demographic and health care access variablesb 1.7 (1.0, 2.9) 0.05 1.5 (1.0, 2.4) 0.08
a

Demographic variables include: age, place of birth, education, employment, housing type, marital status, proportion of life in North America, religion, and speaking English fluently.

b

Includes demographic variables as above and: medical cost concerns, communicate with provider in Chinese, ethnicity/gender of provider, doctor visit in the last year, problems with appointment, finding an interpreter, or transportation, traditional healer visit in last year and private insurance (additional private insurance to national coverage in Vancouver).