Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 2):1027–1044. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00518.x

Table 4.

Summary of Cost and Coverage Impacts of Legislative Bills Analyzed Using the Cost and Coverage Model during the 2004 Legislative Session

Assembly or Senate Bill Number Proposed Benefit Mandate Insured Members Targeted by Proposed Mandate Total Targeted Insured Population (Millions) Insured Members without Coverage before Mandate (Millions) Utilization Rate before Mandate (%) Utilization Rate after Mandate (%) Total Insured Members Affected by Mandate (Millions)
AB 438 Osteoporosis screening Women 50–64 1.777 1.580 11.00 30.00 16.261
AB 547 Ovarian cancer screening Women 18–64 5.890 5.540 6.00 22.00 16.261
SB 101 Substance disorder treatment Members 0–64 16.261 16.261 ** ** 16.261
SB 174 Hearing aids for children Members 0–17* 4.408 1.630 63.00 65.00 15.513
SB 897 Maternity services Members 0–64 0.375 0.375 1.34 1.34 16.261
SB 1555 Maternity services Non-HMO Members 0–64 0.292 0.292 1.34 1.34 6.444
AB 2185 Childhood asthma self-management HMO Members 0–17 3.495 0.377 54.00 64.00 16.261
*

Does not apply to children covered by individual policies and enrolled in HMOs.

**

Multiple services are affected by mandate, so a single utilization rate does not apply.

Source: Analyses of individuals bills conducted by the California Health benefits review program. Individual reports are available at http://www/chbrp.org/analyses.html

HMO, health maintenance organization.