Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 14;5:122. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-122

Table 3.

Effect of methods on the percent of outcomes classified as new infections (n = 139).

Explanatory Variable Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis

OR* (95% CI) p-value OR* (95% CI) p-value
Number of markers
 ≥3 markers vs. 1–2 markers 1· 09 (0.56–2· 13) 0.80 1· 28 (0.45–3· 65) 0.64
Classification of mixed results
 not always recrudescence vs. always recrudescence 1· 92 (0.91–4· 03) 0.09 3· 31 (1· 22–9· 01) 0.02
Treatment group
 artemisinin combination therapy vs. monotherapy 8· 20 (3· 52–19· 11) < 0.0001 8· 56 (3· 34–21· 94) < 0.0001
 non-artemisinin combination therapy vs. monotherapy 2· 72 (1· 03–7· 16) 0.04 2· 30 (0.82–6· 47) 0.12
Geographic region
 Africa vs. rest of the world 0.87 (0.44–1· 71) 0.68 3· 30 (1· 01–10.84) 0.05
Maximum duration of follow-up
 > 28 days vs. ≤ 28 days 2· 54 (1· 23–5· 24) 0.01 4.10 (1· 28–13· 15) 0.02

* Odds Ratio for the outcome defined as: ≥ 50% of samples successfully genotyped were classified as new infections

Mixed results defined as a sample from the day of recurrent parasitaemia containing both alleles present in the baseline sample and new alleles not present in the baseline sample