Abstract
BACKGROUND—Visual acuity and vision related quality of life outcomes in cataract surgery were evaluated in a population based survey in two geographic zones in Nepal. METHODS—Case finding was based on random sampling using a stratified cluster design with door to door enumeration of people aged ⩾45 years followed by eye examinations at village sites. All aphakics/pseudophakics, those with visual acuity less than 6/60 in either eye, and a sample of those with normal visual acuity were administered visual functioning (VF) and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS—15% of the 159 cataract operated cases had presenting visual acuity ⩾6/18 in both eyes, 38% with best corrected visual acuity. 21% were still blind with presenting visual acuity <6/60 in both eyes, 7% with best correction. On a 0-100 scale, mean VF and QOL scores were 87.2 and 93.9 respectively in normally sighted unoperated individuals, dropping to 15.6 and 29.5 for those severely blind (<3/60). Among the cataract operated, mean VF and QOL scores were 47.5 and 55.4, respectively. VF and QOL scores correlated with vision status at statistically significant levels (p <0.0001) CONCLUSION—Cataract surgery outcomes, whether measured by traditional visual acuity or by patient reported VF/QOL, are at levels many would consider unacceptably low. It is apparent that in the quest to reduce cataract blindness much more attention must be given to improving surgery outcomes. Keywords: cataract surgery; visual acuity; visual functioning; quality of life
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ellwein L. B., Kupfer C. Strategic issues in preventing cataract blindness in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(5):681–690. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher A. E., Ellwein L. B., Selvaraj S., Vijaykumar V., Rahmathullah R., Thulasiraj R. D. Measurements of vision function and quality of life in patients with cataracts in southern India. Report of instrument development. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Jun;115(6):767–774. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150769013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazis L. E., Anderson J. J., Meenan R. F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178–S189. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Limburg H., Kumar R., Bachani D. Monitoring and evaluating cataract intervention in India. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Nov;80(11):951–955. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.11.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pokharel G. P., Regmi G., Shrestha S. K., Negrel A. D., Ellwein L. B. Prevalence of blindness and cataract surgery in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;82(6):600–605. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thylefors B., Négrel A. D., Pararajasegaram R., Dadzie K. Y. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]