Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 Jul;21(4):452–456.

Improving access to diagnostics: an evaluation of a satellite laboratory service in the emergency department

P Leman 1, D Guthrie 1, R Simpson 1, F Little 1
PMCID: PMC1726394  PMID: 15208229

Abstract

Objectives: To measure the impact of a satellite laboratory upon laboratory result turnaround times and clinical decision making times.

Design: A prospective cohort study, the intervention group had blood tests sent Monday to Friday 12 noon to 8 pm and the control group had blood tests sent outside these hours. The data were collected over a six week period before the laboratory was opened, and a subsequent six week period.

Setting: An urban teaching hospital emergency department.

Participants: 1065 patients requiring blood tests.

Main outcome measure: Time from the blood sample being sent to the laboratory to the results being available on the clinician's computer.

Results: The time to haematology (blood count) results in the intervention group decreased by 47.2 minutes (95% CI 38.3 to 56.1, p<0.001) after the laboratory was opened. The corresponding control group times were unchanged (0.6 minutes; –13.8 to 15.0, p = 0.94). Similar sized differences were also seen for haemostasis (D-dimer) testing 66.1 (41.8 to 90.4) minutes compared with –14.2 (–47.1 to 18.7) and chemistry 41.3 (30.3 to 52.2) compared with –4.2 (–17.4 to 8.9) testing. Decisions to discharge patients were significantly faster (28.2 minutes, 13.5 to 42.8, p<0.0001) in the intervention group after the laboratory was opened (controls; –2.6 minutes –27.0 to 21.7). No change was seen with decisions to admit patients. There was a trend for earlier laboratory results modifying intravenous drug or fluids orders, or both (p = 0.06)

Conclusion: A comprehensive satellite laboratory service is an important adjunct to improve the timeliness of care in the emergency department.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (61.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Connelly N. R., Magee M., Kiessling B. The use of the iSTAT portable analyzer in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Clin Monit. 1996 Jul;12(4):311–315. doi: 10.1007/BF02221752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delaney B., Wilson S., Fitzmaurice D., Hyde C., Hobbs R. Near-patient tests in primary care: setting the standards for evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):37–41. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenbrey A. B., Artiss J. D. Cardiac troponin T and point-of-care testing for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1995 Nov 1;274(17):1343–1344. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530170023018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Erickson K. A., Wilding P. Evaluation of a novel point-of-care system, the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer. Clin Chem. 1993 Feb;39(2):283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haeney M. Setting standards for pathology service support to emergency services. J R Soc Med. 2001;94 (Suppl 39):26–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kendall J., Reeves B., Clancy M. Point of care testing: randomised controlled trial of clinical outcome. BMJ. 1998 Apr 4;316(7137):1052–1057. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kline J. A., Israel E. G., Michelson E. A., O'Neil B. J., Plewa M. C., Portelli D. C. Diagnostic accuracy of a bedside D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space measurement for rapid exclusion of pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study. JAMA. 2001 Feb 14;285(6):761–768. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.6.761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kratz Alexander, Januzzi James L., Lewandrowski Kent B., Lee-Lewandrowski Elizabeth. Positive predictive value of a point-of-care testing strategy on first-draw specimens for the emergency department-based detection of acute coronary syndromes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Dec;126(12):1487–1493. doi: 10.5858/2002-126-1487-PPVOAP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Parvin C. A., Lo S. F., Deuser S. M., Weaver L. G., Lewis L. M., Scott M. G. Impact of point-of-care testing on patients' length of stay in a large emergency department. Clin Chem. 1996 May;42(5):711–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Price C. P. Point of care testing. BMJ. 2001 May 26;322(7297):1285–1288. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodger M. A., Jones G., Rasuli P., Raymond F., Djunaedi H., Bredeson C. N., Wells P. S. Steady-state end-tidal alveolar dead space fraction and D-dimer: bedside tests to exclude pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):115–119. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singal B. M. Point-of-care blood testing and cost-effective emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;2(3):163–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsai W. W., Nash D. B., Seamonds B., Weir G. J. Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center. Clin Ther. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):898–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. van Heyningen C., Watson I. D., Morrice A. E. Point-of-care testing outcomes in an emergency department. Clin Chem. 1999 Mar;45(3):437–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES