Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 1999 Sep;5(3):203–207. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.203

The spectrum of prevention: developing a comprehensive approach to injury prevention

L Cohen 1, S Swift 1
PMCID: PMC1730534  PMID: 10518268

Abstract

Objective—The purpose of this paper is to describe the "spectrum of prevention", a framework for developing multifaceted approaches to injury prevention. The value of the tool is that it can help practitioners develop and structure comprehensive initiatives.

Methods—The spectrum is comprised of six inter-related action levels: (1) strengthening individual knowledge and skills, (2) promoting community education, (3) educating providers, (4) fostering coalitions and networks, (5) changing organizational practices, and (6) influencing policy and legislation. Activities at each of these levels have the potential to support each other and promote overall community health and safety.

Conclusions—The spectrum of prevention is a tool which can help practitioners and policy leaders move beyond a primarily educational approach to achieve broad community goals through injury prevention strategies that include policy development. This framework has been endorsed and applied in a variety of disciplines, however it has not been formally evaluated, a process that could clarify the scope of its effectiveness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker S. P. International comparisons: useful or odious? Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):3–3. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellis A. A., Trent R. B. Swimming pool drownings and near-drownings among California preschoolers. Public Health Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;112(1):73–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fawcett S. B., Lewis R. K., Paine-Andrews A., Francisco V. T., Richter K. P., Williams E. L., Copple B. Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: the case of Project Freedom. Health Educ Behav. 1997 Dec;24(6):812–828. doi: 10.1177/109019819702400614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grüninger U. J. Patient education: an example of one-to-one communication. J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Jan;9(1):15–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haddon W., Jr On the escape of tigers: an ecologic note. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1970 Dec;60(12):2229–2234. doi: 10.2105/ajph.60.12.2229-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jernigan D. H., Wright P. A. Media advocacy: lessons from community experiences. J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(3):306–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kraus J. F., Peek C., McArthur D. L., Williams A. The effect of the 1992 California motorcycle helmet use law on motorcycle crash fatalities and injuries. JAMA. 1994 Nov 16;272(19):1506–1511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Richmond R., Kehoe L., Heather N., Wodak A., Webster I. General practitioners' promotion of healthy life styles: what patients think. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1996 Apr;20(2):195–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1996.tb01818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schneider M. L., Ituarte P., Stokols D. Evaluation of a community bicycle helmet promotion campaign: what works and why. Am J Health Promot. 1993 Mar-Apr;7(4):281–287. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-7.4.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES