Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2001 Mar;7(1):22–28. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.1.22

Comparison of work related fatal injuries in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: method and overall findings

A Feyer 1, A Williamson 1, N Stout 1, T Driscoll 1, H Usher 1, J Langley 1
PMCID: PMC1730691  PMID: 11289530

Abstract

Objectives—To compare the extent, distribution, and nature of fatal occupational injury in New Zealand, Australia, and the United States.

Setting—Workplaces in New Zealand, Australia, and the United States.

Methods—Data collections based on vital records were used to compare overall rates and distribution of fatal injuries covering the period 1989–92 in Australia and the United States, and 1985–94 in New Zealand. Household labour force data (Australia and the United States) and census data (New Zealand) provided denominator data for calculation of rates. Case definition, case inclusion criteria, and classification of occupation and industry were harmonised across the three datasets.

Results—New Zealand had the highest average annual rate (4.9/100 000), Australia an intermediate rate (3.8/100 000), and the United States the lowest rate (3.2/100 000) of fatal occupational injury. Much of the difference between countries was accounted for by differences in industry distribution. In each country, male workers, older workers, and those working in agriculture, forestry and fishing, in mining and in construction, were consistently at higher risk. Intentional fatal injury was more common in the United States, being rare in both Australia and New Zealand. This difference is likely to be reflected in the more common incidence of work related fatal injuries for sales workers in the United States compared with Australia and New Zealand.

Conclusions—The present results contrasted with those obtained by a recent study that used published omnibus statistics, both in terms of absolute rates and relative ranking of the three countries. Such differences underscore the importance of using like datasets for international comparisons. The consistency of high risk areas across comparable data from comparable nations provides clear targets for further attention. At this stage, however, it is unclear whether the same specific occupations and/or hazards are contributing to the aggregated industry and occupation group rates reported here.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (144.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailer A. J., Stayner L. T., Stout N. A., Reed L. D., Gilbert S. J. Trends in rates of occupational fatal injuries in the United States (1983-92). Occup Environ Med. 1998 Jul;55(7):485–489. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.7.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell C. A., Stout N. A., Bender T. R., Conroy C. S., Crouse W. E., Myers J. R. Fatal occupational injuries in the United States, 1980 through 1985. JAMA. 1990 Jun 13;263(22):3047–3050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cryer P. C., Fleming C. A review of work-related fatal injuries in New Zealand 1975-84--numbers, rates and trends. N Z Med J. 1987 Jan 28;100(816):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harrison J. E., Frommer M. S., Ruck E. A., Blyth F. M. Deaths as a result of work-related injury in Australia, 1982-1984. Med J Aust. 1989 Feb 6;150(3):118–125. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ore T., Stout N. A. Traumatic occupational fatalities in the U.S. and Australian construction industries. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Aug;30(2):202–206. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199608)30:2<202::AID-AJIM11>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Runyan C. W., Loomis D., Butts J. Practices of county medical examiners in classifying deaths as on the job. J Occup Med. 1994 Jan;36(1):36–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Russell J., Conroy C. Representativeness of deaths identified through the injury-at-work item on the death certificate: implications for surveillance. Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1613–1618. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stout N. A., Jenkins E. L., Pizatella T. J. Occupational injury mortality rates in the United States: changes from 1980 to 1989. Am J Public Health. 1996 Jan;86(1):73–77. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stout N., Bell C. Effectiveness of source documents for identifying fatal occupational injuries: a synthesis of studies. Am J Public Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):725–728. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.6.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Takala J. Global estimates of fatal occupational accidents. Epidemiology. 1999 Sep;10(5):640–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES