Abstract
Aims—To compare three commercial screening tests—the PanBio leptospiral IgM enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the Biolisa leptospiral IgM ELISA, and the indirect haemagglutination assay (IHA)—with the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and two "in house" ELISAs—urease and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)—for the detection of leptospiral antibodies in a local UK and Eire population.
Method—Two hundred sera submitted for a differential diagnosis of leptospirosis were tested by all methods. A further 142 sera from patients with antibodies to toxoplasma, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), hepatitis A virus, rheumatoid factor, Borrelia burgdorferi, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, syphilis, cytomegalovirus, and Q fever were tested for crossreactivity.
Results—Compared with the MAT, sensitivity and specificity were found to be: PanBio, 90%/94%; Biolisa with sorbent, 100%/85%; and IHA, 54%/95%. Seven of 200 trial sera gave false negative results with PanBio; 14 of 200 trial sera gave false positive results with Biolisa with sorbent, as did a further 25 of the 142 sera tested for potential crossreactivity. Two of 142 sera gave crossreactions with PanBio and IHA (one each).
Conclusions—The degree of false positivity seen with the Biolisa suggests that the recommended positive value of ≥ 26 Eu/ml should be reassessed using pools of sera from local populations. When the cut off value was reassessed, using a value of ≥ 40 Eu/ml, a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 94%, respectively, was achieved. Even the modified Biolisa appears to be over sensitive and to show a high degree of non-specificity. The IHA, although specific (95%), lacked sensitivity in this study. The PanBio appeared to be the most suitable as a screening test for leptospiral IgM in the UK, although it would be advisable for all positive test results to be confirmed by a different enzyme immunoassay and the MAT.
Key Words: leptospirosis • enzyme linked immunosorbent assay • indirect haemagglutination assay
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adler B., Murphy A. M., Locarnini S. A., Faine S. Detection of specific anti-leptospiral immunoglobulins M and G in human serum by solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 May;11(5):452–457. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.5.452-457.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arimitsu Y., Kmety E., Ananyina Y., Baranton G., Ferguson I. R., Smythe L., Terpstra W. J. Evaluation of the one-point microcapsule agglutination test for diagnosis of leptospirosis. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):395–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner D. J., Kaufmann A. F., Sulzer K. R., Steigerwalt A. G., Rogers F. C., Weyant R. S. Further determination of DNA relatedness between serogroups and serovars in the family Leptospiraceae with a proposal for Leptospira alexanderi sp. nov. and four new Leptospira genomospecies. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999 Apr;49(Pt 2):839–858. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GALTON M. M., POWERS D. K., HALL A. D., CORNELL R. G. A rapid macroscopicslide screening test for the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. Am J Vet Res. 1958 Apr;19(71):505–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levett P. N., Whittington C. U. Evaluation of the indirect hemagglutination assay for diagnosis of acute leptospirosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jan;36(1):11–14. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.11-14.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer M. F., Waitkins S. A., Wanyangu S. W. A comparison of live and formalised leptospiral microscopic agglutination test. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1987 Jun;265(1-2):151–159. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80161-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pappas M. G., Ballou W. R., Gray M. R., Takafuji E. T., Miller R. N., Hockmeyer W. T. Rapid serodiagnosis of leptospirosis using the IgM-specific Dot-ELISA: comparison with the microscopic agglutination test. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985 Mar;34(2):346–354. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sulzer C. R., Glosser J. W., Rogers F., Jones W. L., Frix M. Evaluation of an indirect hemagglutination test for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Sep;2(3):218–221. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.3.218-221.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sulzer C. R., Jones W. L. Evaluation of a hemagglutination test for human leptospirosis. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Nov;26(5):655–657. doi: 10.1128/am.26.5.655-657.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terpstra W. J., Ligthart G. S., Schoone G. J. ELISA for the detection of specific IgM and IgG in human leptospirosis. J Gen Microbiol. 1985 Feb;131(2):377–385. doi: 10.1099/00221287-131-2-377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terpstra W. J., Ligthart G. S., Schoone G. J. Serodiagnosis of human leptospirosis by enzyme-linked-immunosorrbent-assay (ELISA). Zentralbl Bakteriol A. 1980 Aug;247(3):400–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner L. H. Leptospirosis. II. Serology. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1968;62(6):880–899. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(68)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winslow W. E., Merry D. J., Pirc M. L., Devine P. L. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of immunoglobulin M antibody in diagnosis of human leptospiral infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):1938–1942. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.1938-1942.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodward M. J., Swallow C., Kitching A., Dalley C., Sayers A. R. Leptospira hardjo serodiagnosis: a comparison of MAT, ELISA and Immunocomb. Vet Rec. 1997 Dec 6;141(23):603–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]