Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2000 Apr;54(4):254–261. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.4.254

Marital status and suicide in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study

A Kposowa 1
PMCID: PMC1731658  PMID: 10827907

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of marital status on the risk of suicide, using a large nationally representative sample. A related objective was to investigate the association between marital status and suicide by sex.
METHODS—Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to data from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, based on the 1979-1989 follow up. In estimating the effect of marital status, adjustments were made for age, sex, race, education, family income, and region of residence.
RESULTS—For the entire sample, higher risks of suicide were found in divorced than in married persons. Divorced and separated persons were over twice as likely to commit suicide as married persons (RR=2.08, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 1.58, 2.72). Being single or widowed had no significant effect on suicide risk. When data were stratified by sex, it was observed that the risk of suicide among divorced men was over twice that of married men (RR=2.38, CI 1.77, 3.20). Among women, however, there were no statistically significant differentials in the risk of suicide by marital status categories.
CONCLUSIONS—Marital status, especially divorce, has strong net effect on mortality from suicide, but only among men. The study showed that in epidemiological research on suicide, more accurate results would be obtained if samples are stratified on the basis of key demographic or social characteristics. The study further observed that failure to control for relevant socioeconomic variables or combining men and women in the same models could produce misleading results.


Keywords: suicide; marital status; socioeconomic status; effect modification

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breault K. D. Suicide in America: a test of Durkheim's theory of religious and family integration, 1933-1980. AJS. 1986 Nov;92(3):628–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burnley I. H. Socioeconomic and spatial differentials in mortality and means of committing suicide in New South Wales, Australia, 1985-91. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(5):687–698. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00378-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlton J. Trends and patterns in suicide in England and Wales. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24 (Suppl 1):S45–S52. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.supplement_1.s45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassan R. One hundred years of Emile Durkheim's Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;32(2):168–171. doi: 10.3109/00048679809062725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kreitman N. Suicide, age and marital status. Psychol Med. 1988 Feb;18(1):121–128. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700001951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McIntosh J. L., Jewell B. L. Sex difference trends in completed suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1986 Spring;16(1):16–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278x.1986.tb00717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Meehan P. J., Saltzman L. E., Sattin R. W. Suicides among older United States residents: epidemiologic characteristics and trends. Am J Public Health. 1991 Sep;81(9):1198–1200. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.9.1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mendes de Leon C. F., Appels A. W., Otten F. W., Schouten E. G. Risk of mortality and coronary heart disease by marital status in middle-aged men in The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;21(3):460–466. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.3.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Neuringer C. Affect configurations and changes in women who threaten suicide following a crisis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Apr;50(2):182–186. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.2.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rossow I. Suicide, alcohol, and divorce; aspects of gender and family integration. Addiction. 1993 Dec;88(12):1659–1665. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith J. C., Mercy J. A., Conn J. M. Marital status and the risk of suicide. Am J Public Health. 1988 Jan;78(1):78–80. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.1.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sorlie P. D., Backlund E., Keller J. B. US mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Am J Public Health. 1995 Jul;85(7):949–956. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.7.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wenz F. V. Marital status, anomie, and forms of social isolation: a case of high suicide rate among the widowed in an urban sub-area. Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 Nov;38(11):891–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES