Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Apr;55(4):257–262. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.4.257

Health promotion research: dilemmas and challenges

M Koelen 1, L Vaandrager 1, C Colomer 1
PMCID: PMC1731873  PMID: 11238581

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To analyse dilemmas and challenges in health promotion research, and to generate ideas for future development.
METHOD—The analysis is based on authors' experiences in working in the field of research and action in health promotion and on experiences of others as found in literature.
RESULTS—The assumptions underlying scientific research as based in the biomedical design are difficult to meet in community-based health promotion research. Dilemmas are identified in relation to the possibility of defining the independent and dependent variables beforehand and the intermingling of these variables (the intervention and outcome dilemma), the difficulty in quantifying the desired outcomes (the number dilemma), and the problem of diffusion of the programme to the control group (the control group dilemma).
CONCLUSION—Research in health promotion has specific reasons to reconsider the approach towards research, the selection of outcome variables, and research techniques. Strategies and methods to make activities and their outcomes clear are discussed and criteria to judge confidence and applicability of research findings are presented.


Keywords: health promotion research; research dilemmas; research challenges

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (131.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caplan N., Nelson S. D. On being useful: the nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. Am Psychol. 1973 Mar;28(3):199–211. doi: 10.1037/h0034433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheadle A., Sterling T. D., Schmid T. L., Fawcett S. B. Promising community-level indicators for evaluating cardiovascular health-promotion programs. Health Educ Res. 2000 Feb;15(1):109–116. doi: 10.1093/her/15.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean K., Colomer C., Pérez-Hoyos S. Research on lifestyles and health: searching for meaning. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(6):845–855. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00410-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodman R. M. Principals and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1998 Mar;4(2):37–47. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199803000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Green J. The role of theory in evidence-based health promotion practice. Health Educ Res. 2000 Apr;15(2):125–129. doi: 10.1093/her/15.2.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holder H. D., Treno A. J., Saltz R. F., Grube J. W. Summing up. Recommendations and experiences for evaluation of community-level prevention programs. Eval Rev. 1997 Apr;21(2):268–277. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9702100208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Israel B. A., Schulz A. J., Parker E. A., Becker A. B. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kickbusch I. Health promotion: a global perspective. Can J Public Health. 1986 Sep-Oct;77(5):321–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koepsell T. D., Diehr P. H., Cheadle A., Kristal A. Invited commentary: symposium on community intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Sep 15;142(6):594–599. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Macaulay A. C., Commanda L. E., Freeman W. L., Gibson N., McCabe M. L., Robbins C. M., Twohig P. L. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):774–778. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Puska P., Nissinen A., Tuomilehto J., Salonen J. T., Koskela K., McAlister A., Kottke T. E., Maccoby N., Farquhar J. W. The community-based strategy to prevent coronary heart disease: conclusions from the ten years of the North Karelia project. Annu Rev Public Health. 1985;6:147–193. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.06.050185.001051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rifkin S. B., Muller F., Bichmann W. Primary health care: on measuring participation. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(9):931–940. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90413-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shediac-Rizkallah M. C., Bone L. R. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998 Mar;13(1):87–108. doi: 10.1093/her/13.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Susser M. The tribulations of trials--intervention in communities. Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):156–158. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Winkleby M. A. The future of community-based cardiovascular disease intervention studies. Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1369–1372. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES