Abstract
Clinical geneticists are increasingly confronted with ethical tensions between their responsibilities to individual patients and to other family members. This paper considers the ethical implications of a "familial" conception of the clinical genetics role. It argues that dogmatic adherence to either the familial or to the individualistic conception of clinical genetics has the potential to lead to significant harms and to fail to take important obligations seriously.
Geneticists are likely to continue to be required to make moral judgments in the resolution of such tensions and may find it useful to have access to ethics training and support.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ASHG statement. Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Feb;62(2):474–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knoppers Bartha Maria. Genetic information and the family: are we our brother's keeper? Trends Biotechnol. 2002 Feb;20(2):85–86. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(01)01879-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucassen A., Parker M. Revealing false paternity: some ethical considerations. Lancet. 2001 Mar 31;357(9261):1033–1035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04240-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhodes R. Confidentiality, genetic information, and the physician-patient relationship. Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):26–28. doi: 10.1162/152651601750417892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wertz D. C., Fletcher J. C., Mulvihill J. J. Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: cross-cultural comparisons among 18 nations. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Jun;46(6):1200–1213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]