Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2005 Apr;31(4):188–191. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.002931

An antidote to the emerging two tier organ donation policy in Canada: the Public Cadaveric Organ Donation Program

S Giles 1
PMCID: PMC1734127  PMID: 15800355

Abstract

In Canada, as in many other countries, there exists an organ procurement/donation crisis. This paper reviews some of the most common kidney procurement and allocation programmes, analyses them in terms of public and private administration, and argues that privately administered living donor models are an inequitable stopgap measure, the good intentions of which are misplaced and opportunistic. Focusing on how to improve the publicly administered equitable cadaveric donation programme, and at the same time offering one possible explanation for its current failure, it is suggested that the simple moral principle of "give and you shall receive", already considered by some, be extended further. This would allow for those who are willing to sign up to be a public cadaveric donor be given a priority for receiving an organ donation should they ever require it. It is argued that this priority may provide the motivation to give that is so far lacking in Canada. This model is called the Public Cadaveric Organ Donation Program.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (61.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cecka J. M. Kidney transplantation from living unrelated donors. Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:393–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Childress J. F. The failure to give: reducing barriers to organ donation. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001 Mar;11(1):1–16. doi: 10.1353/ken.2001.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delmonico Francis L., Arnold Robert, Scheper-Hughes Nancy, Siminoff Laura A., Kahn Jeffrey, Youngner Stuart J. Ethical incentives--not payment--for organ donation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 20;346(25):2002–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb013216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Erin C. A., Harris J. Presumed consent or contracting out. J Med Ethics. 1999 Oct;25(5):365–366. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.5.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gubernatis G., Kliemt H. Solidarity model: a way to cope with rationing problems in organ transplantation. Transpl Int. 2000;13 (Suppl 1):S607–S608. doi: 10.1007/s001470050412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hauptman P. J., O'Connor K. J. Procurement and allocation of solid organs for transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 6;336(6):422–431. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702063360607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kennedy I., Sells R. A., Daar A. S., Guttmann R. D., Hoffenberg R., Lock M., Radcliffe-Richards J., Tilney N. The case for "presumed consent" in organ donation. International Forum for Transplant Ethics. Lancet. 1998 May 30;351(9116):1650–1652. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)08212-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kleinman I., Lowy F. H. Cadaveric organ donation: ethical considerations for a new approach. CMAJ. 1989 Jul 15;141(2):107–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matas A. J., Garvey C. A., Jacobs C. L., Kahn J. P. Nondirected donation of kidneys from living donors. N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):433–436. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moustarah F. Organ procurement: let's presume consent. CMAJ. 1998 Jan 27;158(2):231–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ross L. F., Rubin D. T., Siegler M., Josephson M. A., Thistlethwaite J. R., Jr, Woodle E. S. Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12;336(24):1752–1755. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706123362412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES