Abstract
Objective: To examine current research payment practices and to inform development of clearer guidelines for researchers and ethics committees.
Design: Exploratory email based questionnaire study of current research participant reimbursement practices. A diverse sample of organisations and individuals were targeted.
Setting: Australia.
Participants: Contacts in 84 key research organisations and select electronic listservers across Australia. A total of 100 completed questionnaires were received with representations from a variety of research areas (for example, market, alcohol and drug, medical, pharmaceutical and social research).
Main measurements: Open-ended and fixed alternative questions about type of research agency; type of research; type of population under study; whether payment is standard; amounts and mechanisms of payment; factors taken into account when deciding on payment practices; and whether payment policies exist.
Results: Reimbursement practice is highly variable. Where it occurs (most commonly for drug dependent rather than health professional or general population samples) it is largely monetary and is for time and out-of-pocket expenses. Ethics committees were reported to be often involved in decision making around reimbursement.
Conclusions: Research subject payment practices vary in Australia. Researchers who do provide payments to research participants generally do so without written policy and procedures. Ethics committees have an important role in developing guidelines in this area. Specific guidelines are needed considering existing local policies and procedures; payment models and their application in diverse settings; case study examples of types and levels of reimbursement; applied definitions of incentive and inducement; and the rationale for diverse payment practices in different settings.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dickert N., Grady C. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 15;341(3):198–203. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907153410312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickert Neal, Emanuel Ezekiel, Grady Christine. Paying research subjects: an analysis of current policies. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):368–373. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fry C., Dwyer R. For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction. 2001 Sep;96(9):1319–1325. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.969131911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasprzyk D., Montaño D. E., St Lawrence J. S., Phillips W. R. The effects of variations in mode of delivery and monetary incentive on physicians' responses to a mailed survey assessing STD practice patterns. Eval Health Prof. 2001 Mar;24(1):3–17. doi: 10.1177/01632780122034740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Latterman J., Merz J. F. How much are subjects paid to participate in research? Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):45–46. doi: 10.1162/152651601300169040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemmens Trudo, Elliott Carl. Guinea pigs on the payroll: the ethics of paying research subjects. Account Res. 1999;7(1):3–20. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudy E. B., Estok P. J., Kerr M. E., Menzel L. Research incentives: money versus gifts. Nurs Res. 1994 Jul-Aug;43(4):253–255. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199407000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weise Kathryn L., Smith Martin L., Maschke Karen J., Copeland H. Liesel. National practices regarding payment to research subjects for participating in pediatric research. Pediatrics. 2002 Sep;110(3):577–582. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]