Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2000 Jun;57(6):422–430. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.6.422

Acute vascular responses to the frequency of vibration transmitted to the hand

M Bovenzi 1, C Lindsell 1, M Griffin 1
PMCID: PMC1739957  PMID: 10810133

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To investigate the acute effects of the frequency of hand transmitted vibration on finger circulation. A further aim was to investigate whether the frequency weighting assumed in current standards for hand transmitted vibration reflects the haemodynamic changes which occur in the fingers exposed to vibration with different frequencies but with the same frequency weighted acceleration magnitude.
METHODS—Finger skin temperature (FST) and finger blood flow (FBF) were measured in the middle fingers of both hands of 10 healthy men. With a static load of 10 N, the right hand was exposed for 15 minutes to the following root mean square (rms) acceleration magnitudes and frequencies of vertical vibration: 5.5 m/s2 at 16 Hz; 11 m/s2 at 31.5 Hz; 22 m/s2 at 63 Hz; 44 m/s2 at 125 Hz; and 88 m/s2 at 250 Hz. These exposures to vibration produce the same frequency weighted acceleration magnitude (5.5 m/s2 rms) according to the frequency weighting included in the international standard ISO 5349. A control condition consisted of exposure to the static load only. Finger circulation was measured before application of the vibration and static load and at fixed intervals during exposure to vibration and a 45 minute recovery period.
RESULTS—No significant changes in finger circulation were found with only the static load. The FST did not change significantly during or after acute exposure to vibration. In the vibrated right finger, exposures to vibration with frequencies of 31.5-250 Hz provoked a greater reduction in FBF than did vibration of 16 Hz or the static load only. In the non-vibrated left finger, the FBF measured with vibration at each frequency of 63-250 Hz was significantly lower than that measured with static load only. The reduction in FBF during exposure to vibration with any frequency was stronger in the vibrated finger than in the non-vibrated finger. In both fingers, there was a progressive decrease in FBF after the end of exposure to vibration with frequencies of 31.5-250 Hz. The higher the frequency of vibration, the stronger the decrease in FBF in both fingers during recovery.
CONCLUSIONS—Acute exposures to vibration with equal frequency weighted magnitude reduce the FBF in both vibrated and non-vibrated fingers for frequencies between 31.5 and 250 Hz. The extent of digital vasoconstriction after exposure to vibration increases with increasing frequency. The frequency weighting given in current standards tends to overestimate the vasoconstriction associated with acute exposures to vibration frequencies around 16 Hz.


Keywords: finger circulation; frequency weighted acceleration magnitude; vibration frequency

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azuma T., Ohhashi T., Sakaguchi M. Vibration-induced hyperresponsiveness of arterial smooth muscle to noradrenaline with special reference to Raynaud's phenomenon in vibration disease. Cardiovasc Res. 1978 Dec;12(12):758–764. doi: 10.1093/cvr/12.12.758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bovenzi M., Griffin M. J. Haemodynamic changes in ipsilateral and contralateral fingers caused by acute exposures to hand transmitted vibration. Occup Environ Med. 1997 Aug;54(8):566–576. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.8.566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bovenzi M., Griffin M. J., Ruffell C. M. Acute effects of vibration on digital circulatory function in healthy men. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Dec;52(12):834–841. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.12.834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bovenzi M., Lindsell C. J., Griffin M. J. Duration of acute exposures to vibration and finger circulation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Apr;24(2):130–137. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bovenzi M., Lindsell C. J., Griffin M. J. Magnitude of acute exposures to vibration and finger circulation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Jun;25(3):278–284. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Egan C. E., Espie B. H., McGrann S., McKenna K. M., Allen J. A. Acute effects of vibration on peripheral blood flow in healthy subjects. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Oct;53(10):663–669. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.10.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Furuta M., Sakakibara H., Miyao M., Kondo T., Yamada S. Effect of vibration frequency on finger blood flow. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(3):221–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00381572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Färkkilä M., Pyykkö I. Blood flow in the contralateral hand during vibration and hand grip contractions of lumberjacks. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1979 Dec;5(4):368–374. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GREENFIELD A. D., WHITNEY R. J., MOWBRAY J. F. Methods for the investigation of peripheral blood flow. Br Med Bull. 1963 May;19:101–109. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenstein D., Kester R. C. Acute vibration--its effect on digital blood flow by central and local mechanisms. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1992;206(2):105–108. doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1992_206_274_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyvärinen J., Pyykkö I., Sundberg S. Vibration frequencies and amplitudes in the aetiology of traumatic vasospastic disease. Lancet. 1973 Apr 14;1(7807):791–794. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)90598-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kent P., Williams G., Kester R. C. Altered sensitivity of digital blood flow to acute vibration in patients with vasospastic disease. J Biomed Eng. 1991 May;13(3):269–271. doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(91)90141-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nielsen P. E., Bell G., Lassen N. A. Strain gauge studies of distal blood pressure in normal subjects and in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Analysis of normal variation and reproducibility and comparison to intraarterial measurements. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1973;128:103–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Olsen N., Petring O. U., Rossing N. Transitory postural vasomotor dysfunction in the finger after short term hand vibration. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Aug;46(8):575–581. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.8.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Olsen N. Vibration aftereffects on vasoconstrictor response to cold in the normal finger. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(3):246–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00235101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Welsh C. L. The effect of vibration on digital blood flow. Br J Surg. 1980 Oct;67(10):708–710. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800671009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES