Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Mar;61(3):275–279. doi: 10.1136/oem.2002.005769

Worksite health promotion using individual counselling and the effectiveness on sick leave; results of a randomised controlled trial

K Proper 1, A J van der Beek 1, V Hildebrandt 1, J Twisk 1, W van Mechelen 1
PMCID: PMC1740726  PMID: 14985524

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of a worksite health promotion programme by individual counselling on sick leave.

Methods: Three municipal services of Enschede, the Netherlands, participated in this trial. A total of 299 civil servants were measured at baseline and were randomised by cluster into the intervention (n = 131) or the control group (n = 168). During nine months, subjects in the intervention group received a total of seven consultations, particularly aimed at increasing their physical activity level and improving their dietary habits. Both the intervention and the control subjects received written information as to several lifestyle factors. Sick leave data regarding the nine month intervention period (from May until January) were collected from each municipal service's personnel department. In addition, sick leave data concerning the nine month period pre- and post-intervention were collected. Sick leave data were analysed using multilevel analysis.

Results: For both groups, the mean sick leave rate during the intervention increased compared to before the intervention. After the intervention period, the control group increased even more (from 22.9 to 27.6 days), whereas the intervention group slightly decreased (from 21.5 to 20.5 days). Median values of sick leave rate decreased for both groups. No statistically significant intervention effect was found. In both groups, the mean sick leave frequency slightly decreased over time (intervention effects were not significant).

Conclusions: Results showed no significant effect of individual counselling on sick leave. Continued research investigating the effectiveness of this individual counselling programme on several health related outcomes is useful to clarify the trend observed in sick leave.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASTRAND P. O., RYHMING I. A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during sub-maximal work. J Appl Physiol. 1954 Sep;7(2):218–221. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1954.7.2.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baecke J. A., Burema J., Frijters J. E. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Nov;36(5):936–942. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.5.936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calfas K. J., Long B. J., Sallis J. F., Wooten W. J., Pratt M., Patrick K. A controlled trial of physician counseling to promote the adoption of physical activity. Prev Med. 1996 May-Jun;25(3):225–233. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox M., Shephard R. J., Corey P. INfluence of an employee fitness programme upon fitness, productivity and absenteeism. Ergonomics. 1981 Oct;24(10):795–806. doi: 10.1080/00140138108924900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donner A., Klar N. Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1;140(3):279–301. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee I. M., Sesso H. D., Paffenbarger R. S., Jr Physical activity and coronary heart disease risk in men: does the duration of exercise episodes predict risk? Circulation. 2000 Aug 29;102(9):981–986. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.9.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nurminen Eija, Malmivaara Antti, Ilmarinen Juhani, Ylöstalo Pekka, Mutanen Pertti, Ahonen Guy, Aro Timo. Effectiveness of a worksite exercise program with respect to perceived work ability and sick leaves among women with physical work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Apr;28(2):85–93. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pate R. R., Pratt M., Blair S. N., Haskell W. L., Macera C. A., Bouchard C., Buchner D., Ettinger W., Heath G. W., King A. C. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):402–407. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pols M. A., Peeters P. H., Ocké M. C., Bueno-de-Mesquita H. B., Slimani N., Kemper H. C., Collette H. J. Relative validity and repeatability of a new questionnaire on physical activity. Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):37–43. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390–395. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Proper Karin I., Hildebrandt Vincent H., Van der Beek Allard J., Twisk Jos W. R., Van Mechelen Willem. Effect of individual counseling on physical activity fitness and health: a randomized controlled trial in a workplace setting. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Apr;24(3):218–226. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00645-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Proper Karin I., Staal Bart J., Hildebrandt Vincent H., van der Beek Allard J., van Mechelen Willem. Effectiveness of physical activity programs at worksites with respect to work-related outcomes. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Apr;28(2):75–84. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sallis J. F., Haskell W. L., Wood P. D., Fortmann S. P., Rogers T., Blair S. N., Paffenbarger R. S., Jr Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jan;121(1):91–106. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shephard R. J. Worksite fitness and exercise programs: a review of methodology and health impact. Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jul-Aug;10(6):436–452. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.6.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Taylor C. B., Coffey T., Berra K., Iaffaldano R., Casey K., Haskell W. L. Seven-day activity and self-report compared to a direct measure of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Dec;120(6):818–824. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wannamethee S. G., Shaper A. G. Physical activity in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: an epidemiological perspective. Sports Med. 2001 Feb;31(2):101–114. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200131020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Vet Henrica C. W., Heymans Martijn W., Dunn Kate M., Pope Daniel P., van der Beek Allard J., Macfarlane Gary J., Bouter Lex M., Croft Peter R. Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2409–2416. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000030307.34002.BE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES