Abstract
Objective: To analyse clinical and non-clinical factors determining the selection for coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Design: Single centre, prospective cohort study.
Participants: Eighty consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of ACS during the period 21 May 2001 to 4 July 2001.
Setting: Coronary care unit of a tertiary referral centre, the Manchester Royal Infirmary.
Data collection: Information concerning baseline patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and the selection for angiography was collected from the patient notes.
Data analysis: Windows SPSS version 9.0 using cross tabulations with χ2 estimation and binomial logistic regression analysis.
Main outcome measure: Selection for angiography in ACS.
Results: Cross tabulations with χ2 analysis and logistic regression analysis identified significant non-clinical factors predicting the use of angiography. Although clinical factors such as recurrent ischaemia (odds ratio 5.11) influenced the decision to undergo coronary angiography, non-clinical factors such as young age (odds ratio 6.88 for <65 years old), gender (odds ratio 3.81 for males), admission on a weekday (odds ratio 0.2488 for admission on the weekend), and consultant in charge (odds ratio 0.111 for consultant "2") independently predicted the use of angiography in ACS.
Conclusion: The selection of patients for angiography in ACS is not based purely on clinical criteria. Awareness of the apparent sources of bias among clinical decision makers may improve management of these patients.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ayanian J. Z., Epstein A. M. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):221–225. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowling A., Bond M., McKee D., McClay M., Banning A. P., Dudley N., Elder A., Martin A., Blackman I. Equity in access to exercise tolerance testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass grafting by age, sex and clinical indications. Heart. 2001 Jun;85(6):680–686. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.6.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heller L. I. Diagnostic evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease. Cardiology. 1995;86(4):318–323. doi: 10.1159/000176896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krumholz H. M., Douglas P. S., Lauer M. S., Pasternak R. C. Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Intern Med. 1992 May 15;116(10):785–790. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-10-785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahy I. R., Hillis G. S., Jennings K. P. Risk stratification after myocardial infarction in Scotland. Scott Med J. 1998 Jun;43(3):72–73. doi: 10.1177/003693309804300303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller C., Lipscomb K., Curzen N. Are district general hospital patients with unstable angina at a disadvantage? Postgrad Med J. 2003 Feb;79(928):93–98. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.928.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray C. J., Lopez A. D. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997 May 3;349(9061):1269–1276. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07493-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pilote L., Miller D. P., Califf R. M., Rao J. S., Weaver W. D., Topol E. J. Determinants of the use of coronary angiography and revascularization after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 17;335(16):1198–1205. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610173351606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]