Abstract
A modified critical-incident analysis technique was used in a retrospective examination of the characteristics of human error and equipment failure in anesthetic practice. The objective was to uncover patterns of frequently occurring incidents that are in need of careful prospective investigation. Forty seven interviews were conducted with staff and resident anesthesiologists at one urban teaching institution, and descriptions of 359 preventable incidents were obtained. Twenty three categories of details from these descriptions were subjected to computer-aided analysis for trends and patterns. Most of the preventable incidents involved human error (82%), with breathing-circuit disconnections, inadvertent changes in gas flow, and drug syringe errors being frequent problems. Overt equipment failures constituted only 14% of the total number of preventable incidents, but equipment design was indictable in many categories of human error, as were inadequate experience and insufficient familiarity with equipment or with the specific surgical procedure. Other factors frequently associated with incidents were inadequate communication among personnel, haste or lack of precaution, and distraction. Results from multi-hospital studies based on the methodology developed could be used for more objective determination of priorities and planning of specific investments for decreasing the risk associated with anesthesia.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BEECHER H. K., TODD D. P. A study of the deaths associated with anesthesia and surgery: based on a study of 599, 548 anesthesias in ten institutions 1948-1952, inclusive. Ann Surg. 1954 Jul;140(1):2–35. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195407000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blum L. L. Equipment design and "human" limitations. Anesthesiology. 1971 Jul;35(1):101–102. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197107000-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CLIFTON B. S., HOTTEN W. I. DEATHS ASSOCIATED WITH ANAESTHESIA. Br J Anaesth. 1963 Apr;35:250–259. doi: 10.1093/bja/35.4.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper J. B., Newbower R. S., Moore J. W., Trautman E. D. A new anesthesia delivery system. Anesthesiology. 1978 Nov;49(5):310–318. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197811000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DRIPPS R. D., LAMONT A., ECKENHOFF J. E. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA. 1961 Oct 21;178:261–266. doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040420001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EDWARDS G., MORTON H. J., PASK E. A., WYLIE W. D. Deaths associated with anaesthesia; a report on 1,000 cases. Anaesthesia. 1956 Jul;11(3):194–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1956.tb07975.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FLANAGAN J. C. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954 Jul;51(4):327–358. doi: 10.1037/h0061470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FRANKMANN J. P., ADAMS J. A. Psychological bulletin. Psychol Bull. 1962 Jul;59:257–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JERISON H. J., PICKETT R. M. VIGILANCE: A REVIEW AND RE-EVALUATION. Hum Factors. 1963 Jun;5:211–238. doi: 10.1177/001872086300500305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips O. C., Capizzi L. S. Anesthesia mortality. Clin Anesth. 1974;10(3):220–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SAFREN M. A., CHAPANIS A. A critical incident study of hospital medication errors. Hospitals. 1960 May 1;34:32–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor G., Larson C. P., Jr, Prestwich R. Unexpected cardiac arrest during anesthesia and surgery. An environmental study. JAMA. 1976 Dec 13;236(24):2758–2760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wylie W. D. 'There, but for the grace of God...'. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1975 Apr;56(4):171–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]