Skip to main content
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2000 Jun;76(3):173–176. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.3.173

Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence by PCR and LCR in women presenting for termination of pregnancy

S Garland 1, S Tabrizi 1, J Hallo 1, S Chen 1
PMCID: PMC1744144  PMID: 10961192

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in a patient population presenting for legal termination of pregnancy by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR), from first catch urine and self administered tampons, and comparing with the traditionally collected endocervical swab tested by both PCR and culture.

Methods: Consecutive women attending for legal termination of pregnancy were screened for chlamydia by patient collected first catch urine and tampon, and physician collected endocervical swab.

Results: Of 1175 patients with complete samples, there were 33 (2.8%) in whom chlamydia was detected by two or more assays from one or more sample site. Chlamydia was detected equally well by both PCR and LCR in first catch urine (p = 0.25), tampon (p = 0.5), and endocervical swab (p = 0.5). However, both PCR and LCR were significantly better than culture of an endocervical swab (p = 0.0005) for detection of C trachomatis.

Conclusion: The prevalence of chlamydia in patients presenting for termination of pregnancy was 2.8%. A simple efficient way of performing screening for chlamydia for women presenting for termination of pregnancy is by first catch urine or tampon, which can be tested by the highly sensitive amplification assays, PCR or LCR.

Key Words: polymerase chain reaction; ligase chain reaction; Chlamydia trachomatis; pregnancy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coleman P., Varitek V., Mushahwar I. K., Marchlewicz B., Safford J., Hansen J., Kurpiewski G., Grier T. TestPack Chlamydia, a new rapid assay for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Dec;27(12):2811–2814. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.12.2811-2814.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fairley C. K., Chen S., Tabrizi S. N., Quinn M. A., McNeil J. J., Garland S. M. Tampons: a novel patient-administered method for the assessment of genital human papillomavirus infection. J Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;165(6):1103–1106. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.6.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Garland S. M., Gertig D. M., McInnes J. A. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia. Med J Aust. 1993 Jul 19;159(2):90–96. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holland S. M., Gaydos C. A., Quinn T. C. Detection and differentiation of Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Chlamydia pneumoniae by DNA amplification. J Infect Dis. 1990 Oct;162(4):984–987. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.4.984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Møller B. R., Ahrons S., Laurin J., Mårdh P. A. Pelvic infection after elective abortion associated with Chlamydia trachomatis. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Feb;59(2):210–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paavonen J., Vesterinen E. Chlamydia trachomatis in cervicitis and urethritis in women. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1982;32:45–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pasternack R., Vuorinen P., Pitkäjärvi T., Koskela M., Miettinen A. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Feb;35(2):402–405. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.2.402-405.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paterson B. A., Tabrizi S. N., Garland S. M., Fairley C. K., Bowden F. J. The tampon test for trichomoniasis: a comparison between conventional methods and a polymerase chain reaction for Trichomonas vaginalis in women. Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Apr;74(2):136–139. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Skjeldestad F. E., Tuveng J., Solberg A. G., Molne K., Dalen A., Buhaug H. Induced abortion: Chlamydia trachomatis and postabortal complications. A cost benefit analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(6):525–529. doi: 10.3109/00016348809029864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stevenson M. M., Radcliffe K. W. Preventing pelvic infection after abortion. Int J STD AIDS. 1995 Sep-Oct;6(5):305–312. doi: 10.1177/095646249500600501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tabrizi S. N., Chen S., Borg A. J., Lees M. I., Fairley C. K., Jackson H. D., Gust C. H., Migliorini G., Garland S. M. Patient-administered tampon-collected genital cells in the assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection using polymerase chain reaction. Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Nov-Dec;23(6):494–497. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199611000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tabrizi S. N., Lees M. I., Garland S. M. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Mol Cell Probes. 1993 Oct;7(5):357–360. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1993.1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tabrizi S., Chen S., Fairley C., Borg A., Migliorini G., Lees M., Garland S. Tampon-collected genital cells in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis. 1993 Sep;168(3):796–797. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.3.796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomas B. J., Pierpoint T., Taylor-Robinson D., Renton A. M. Sensitivity of the ligase chain reaction assay for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal swabs from women who are infected at other sites. Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Apr;74(2):140–141. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.2.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wein P., Kloss M., Garland S. M. Postabortal pelvic sepsis in association with Chlamydia trachomatis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Nov;30(4):347–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1990.tb02026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Welsh L. E., Quinn T. C., Gaydos C. A. Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3078–3081. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3078-3081.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. van Doornum G. J., Buimer M., Prins M., Henquet C. J., Coutinho R. A., Plier P. K., Tomazic-Allen S., Hu H., Lee H. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2042–2047. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2042-2047.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES