Skip to main content
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2005 Jun;81(3):236–238. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.011080

Monitoring STI prevalence using telephone surveys and mailed urine specimens: a pilot test

E Eggleston 1, C Turner 1, S Rogers 1, A Roman 1, W Miller 1, M Villarroel 1, L Ganapathi 1
PMCID: PMC1744988  PMID: 15923293

Abstract

Objectives: This pilot test assessed the feasibility of a cost effective population based approach to STI monitoring using automated telephone interviews, urine specimen collection kits sent out and returned by US Postal Service mail, and monetary incentives to motivate participation.

Methods: 100 residents of Baltimore, MD, USA, completed an automated telephone survey and agreed to mail in a urine specimen to be tested for chlamydia and gonorrhoea. Participants were paid $10 for completing the survey and $40 for mailing the specimen.

Results: 86% of survey participants mailed in a urine specimen for testing.

Conclusions: Automated telephone surveys linked with testing of mailed-in urine specimens may be a feasible lower cost (relative to household surveys) method of estimating infection prevalences in a population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (51.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bloomfield P. J., Steiner K. C., Kent C. K., Klausner J. D. Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):28–30. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloomfield Peter J., Kent Charlotte, Campbell Diane, Hanbrook Larry, Klausner Jeffrey D. Community-based chlamydia and gonorrhea screening through the United States mail, San Francisco. Sex Transm Dis. 2002 May;29(5):294–297. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200205000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Macleod J., Rowsell R., Horner P., Crowley T., Caul E. O., Low N., Smith G. D. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening? Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):455–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rogstad K. E., Bates S. M., Partridge S., Kudesia G., Poll R., Osborne M. A., Dixon S. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male undergraduates: a postal survey. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Apr;77(2):111–113. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stephenson J., Carder C., Copas A., Robinson A., Ridgway G., Haines A. Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women? Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Feb;76(1):25–27. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Turner Charles F., Rogers Susan M., Miller Heather G., Miller William C., Gribble James N., Chromy James R., Leone Peter A., Cooley Phillip C., Quinn Thomas C., Zenilman Jonathan M. Untreated gonococcal and chlamydial infection in a probability sample of adults. JAMA. 2002 Feb 13;287(6):726–733. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.6.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES