Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Sep;13(3):289–295. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007138

Psychosocial work conditions, social capital, and daily smoking: a population based study

M Lindstrom
PMCID: PMC1747881  PMID: 15333886

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the associations between psychosocial conditions at work, social capital/social participation, and daily smoking.

Design/setting/participants/measurements: The 2000 public health survey in Scania is a cross sectional postal questionnaire study with a 59% participation rate. A total of 5180 persons aged 18–64 years that belonged to the work force and the unemployed were included in this study. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between psychosocial factors at work/unemployment, social participation, and daily smoking. Psychosocial conditions at work were defined according to the Karasek-Theorell demand–control/decision latitudes into relaxed, active, passive, and jobstrain categories. The multivariate analyses included age, country of origin, education and economic stress.

Results: 17.2% proportion of all men and 21.9% of all women were daily smokers. The jobstrain (high demands/low control) and unemployed categories had significantly higher odds ratios of daily smoking among both men and women compared to the relaxed (low demands/high control) reference category. The passive (low demands/low control), jobstrain, and unemployed categories were also significantly associated with low social participation. Low social participation was significantly and positively associated with daily smoking within each of the psychosocial work conditions and unemployed categories.

Conclusions: The positive association between low social capital/low social participation and daily smoking is well known. However, both social participation and daily smoking are associated with psychosocial work conditions and unemployment. Psychosocial work conditions and unemployment may affect daily smoking both directly and through a pathway including social participation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Greenlund K. J., Liu K., Knox S., McCreath H., Dyer A. R., Gardin J. Psychosocial work characteristics and cardiovascular disease risk factors in young adults: the CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Disease in Young Adults. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(5):717–723. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00385-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hanson B. S., Ostergren P. O., Elmståhl S., Isacsson S. O., Ranstam J. Reliability and validity assessments of measures of social networks, social support and control--results from the Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study. Scand J Soc Med. 1997 Dec;25(4):249–257. doi: 10.1177/140349489702500407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haynes S. G., Feinleib M., Kannel W. B. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham Study. III. Eight-year incidence of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Jan;111(1):37–58. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hellerstedt W. L., Jeffery R. W. The association of job strain and health behaviours in men and women. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;26(3):575–583. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.3.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karasek R. A., Theorell T. G., Schwartz J., Pieper C., Alfredsson L. Job, psychological factors and coronary heart disease. Swedish prospective findings and US prevalence findings using a new occupational inference method. Adv Cardiol. 1982;29:62–67. doi: 10.1159/000406198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karasek R., Baker D., Marxer F., Ahlbom A., Theorell T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694–705. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kawachi I., Kennedy B. P., Glass R. Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1187–1193. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kawachi I., Kennedy B. P., Wilkinson R. G. Crime: social disorganization and relative deprivation. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Mar;48(6):719–731. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00400-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindström M., Hanson B. S., Ostergren P. O., Berglund G. Socioeconomic differences in smoking cessation: the role of social participation. Scand J Public Health. 2000 Sep;28(3):200–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindström M., Isacsson S-O, Elmståhl S. Impact of different aspects of social participation and social capital on smoking cessation among daily smokers: a longitudinal study. Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12(3):274–281. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.3.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindström M., Isacsson S-O, Malmö Shoulder-Neck Study Group Long term and transitional intermittent smokers: a longitudinal study. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):61–67. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindström M., Ostergren P. O. Intermittent and daily smokers: two different socioeconomic patterns, and diverging influence of social participation. Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):258–266. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindström Martin, Isacsson Sven-Olof, Malmö Shoulder-Neck Study Group Smoking cessation among daily smokers, aged 45-69 years: a longitudinal study in Malmö, Sweden. Addiction. 2002 Feb;97(2):205–215. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindström Martin. Social capital and the miniaturization of community among daily and intermittent smokers: a population-based study. Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):177–184. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00049-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Muntaner C., Lynch J. Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: a critique of Wilkinson's neo-Durkheimian research program. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29(1):59–81. doi: 10.2190/G8QW-TT09-67PL-QTNC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Muntaner C., Lynch J., Smith G. D. Social capital, disorganized communities, and the third way: understanding the retreat from structural inequalities in epidemiology and public health. Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(2):213–237. doi: 10.2190/NVW3-4HH0-74PX-AC38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Niedhammer I., Goldberg M., Leclerc A., David S., Bugel I., Landre M. F. Psychosocial work environment and cardiovascular risk factors in an occupational cohort in France. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Feb;52(2):93–100. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.2.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Siegrist J., Peter R., Junge A., Cremer P., Seidel D. Low status control, high effort at work and ischemic heart disease: prospective evidence from blue-collar men. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(10):1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90234-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steffensen F. H., Lauritzen T., Sørensen H. T. Validity of self-reported smoking habits. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Sep;13(3):236–237. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Suadicani P., Hein H. O., Gyntelberg F. Are social inequalities as associated with the risk of ischaemic heart disease a result of psychosocial working conditions? Atherosclerosis. 1993 Jul;101(2):165–175. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(93)90113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tate J. C., Pomerleau C. S., Pomerleau O. F. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological smoking motives: a replication and extension. Addiction. 1994 Mar;89(3):321–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Verkerk P. H., Buitendijk S. E., Verloove-Vanhorick S. P. Differential misclassification of alcohol and cigarette consumption by pregnancy outcome. Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;23(6):1218–1225. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.6.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wells A. J., English P. B., Posner S. F., Wagenknecht L. E., Perez-Stable E. J. Misclassification rates for current smokers misclassified as nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1503–1509. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES