Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 24;148(4):544–552. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706738

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Concentration–response curves to NTG in wt mice aortas. Preparations were precontracted with U-46619 (10−7M) and NTG was given cumulatively. *P<0.05 versus control and P<0.05 versus rosuvastatin–NTG. Results are expressed as mean±s.e.m. (b) Concentration–effect curve to NTG in eNOS−/− mice aortas. Preparations were precontracted with U-46619 (10−7M) and NTG was given cumulatively. *P<0.05 versus control and P<0.05 versus rosuvastatin–NTG. Results are expressed as mean±s.e.m.