Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2004 Feb;10(1):16–20. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.003889

Risk of hip fracture in protected and unprotected falls in nursing homes in Norway

L Forsen 1, A Sogaard 1, S Sandvig 1, A Schuller 1, U Roed 1, C Arstad 1
PMCID: PMC1756542  PMID: 14760021

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the probability of hip fracture in protected and unprotected falls in a real world setting in nursing homes.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Seventeen nursing homes (965 beds) in Norway.

Subjects: All residents in the nursing homes with at least one fall during the intervention period.

Intervention: Hip protectors were introduced as a regular part of the health care service for all the residents for an intervention period of 18 months. Residents who were considered high risk were especially encouraged to be regular users of hip protectors.

Main outcome measures: Hip fracture in protected and unprotected falls.

Results: At the time of the first fall within each faller, 430 were non-users of hip protectors, while 84 were registered as users, but did not wear it, and 191 were users and did wear it. The odds ratio of suffering a hip fracture was 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.75 for wearers compared with non-wearers in the first fall, adjusted for age, gender, and whether they were registered as users or not.

Conclusion: The odds of suffering a hip fracture for nursing home high risk residents was reduced to less than a third in protected falls compared with unprotected falls. Or, in other words, the odds of hip fracture showed a 69% reduction in protected falls compared with unprotected falls.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (204.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cameron I. D., Cumming R. G., Kurrle S. E., Quine S., Lockwood K., Salkeld G., Finnegan T. A randomised trial of hip protector use by frail older women living in their own homes. Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;9(2):138–141. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell A. J. Purity, pragmatism and hip protector pads. Age Ageing. 2001 Nov;30(6):431–432. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.6.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cumming R. G., Kelsey J. L., Nevitt M. C. Methodologic issues in the study of frequent and recurrent health problems. Falls in the elderly. Ann Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;1(1):49–56. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(90)90018-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glasgow Russell E., Lichtenstein Edward, Marcus Alfred C. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1261–1267. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grisso J. A., Kelsey J. L., Strom B. L., Chiu G. Y., Maislin G., O'Brien L. A., Hoffman S., Kaplan F. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1991 May 9;324(19):1326–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105093241905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kannus P., Parkkari J., Niemi S., Pasanen M., Palvanen M., Järvinen M., Vuori I. Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1506–1513. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lauritzen J. B., Petersen M. M., Lund B. Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures. Lancet. 1993 Jan 2;341(8836):11–13. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92480-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meyer Gabriele, Warnke Andrea, Bender R., Mühlhauser I. Effect on hip fractures of increased use of hip protectors in nursing homes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003 Jan 11;326(7380):76–76. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7380.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Parkkari J., Kannus P., Palvanen M., Natri A., Vainio J., Aho H., Vuori I., Järvinen M. Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999 Sep;65(3):183–187. doi: 10.1007/s002239900679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson P. W., Jones C. Adherence to hip protector use in elderly people requiring domicilary care is greater in fallers than non-fallers. Age Ageing. 2000 Sep;29(5):459–459. doi: 10.1093/ageing/29.5.459a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Torgerson David, Birks Yvonne, Aspray Terry J. Purity, pragmatism and hip protector pads. Age Ageing. 2002 Jul;31(4):319–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES