Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2002 Dec;73(6):721–726. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.721

Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus

B Kahlon 1, G Sundbarg 1, S Rehncrona 1
PMCID: PMC1757331  PMID: 12438477

Abstract

Objective: To compare the lumbar infusion test and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test for predicting the outcome of shunt surgery in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Methods: 68 patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus were studied. The absence of preceding history indicated idiopathic disease in 75% of these. All patients were assessed twice with walking and psychometric tests before lumbar infusion test and tap test assessments. The lumbar infusion test was done using a constant infusion rate (0.80 ml/min) and regarded as positive if the steady state CSF plateau pressure reached levels of > 22 mm Hg (resistance to outflow > 14 mm Hg/ml/min). The tap test was regarded as positive if two or more of four different test items improved after CSF removal. As the variability in baseline test results was large, the better of two evaluations was used in comparisons with the results after CSF removal, as well as to evaluate the outcome after shunt surgery. Only patients with a positive lumbar infusion test or a positive tap test had surgery.

Results: The results of the CSF tap test and the lumbar infusion test agreed in only 45% of the patients. Of the total cohort, 47 (69%) had positive test results and were operated on; 45 (96%) of these reported subjective improvement, and postoperative assessments verified the improvements in 38 (81%). Improvements were highly significant in walking, memory, and reaction time tests (p < 0.001). Most of the patients improved by surgery (84%) were selected by a positive lumbar infusion test, and only 42% by a positive tap test. Positive predictive values were 80% for lumbar infusion test and 94% for tap test. The false negative predictions in the operated group were much higher (58%) with the tap test than with the lumbar infusion test (16%).

Conclusions: Both the lumbar infusion test and the tap test can predict a positive outcome of shunt operations in unselected patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. The two tests are complementary and should be used together for optimal patient selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (160.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADAMS R. D., FISHER C. M., HAKIM S., OJEMANN R. G., SWEET W. H. SYMPTOMATIC OCCULT HYDROCEPHALUS WITH "NORMAL" CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE.A TREATABLE SYNDROME. N Engl J Med. 1965 Jul 15;273:117–126. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196507152730301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams R. D. Further observations on normal pressure hydrocephalus. Proc R Soc Med. 1966 Nov;59(11 Pt 1):1135–1140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Børgesen S. E. Conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1984;71(1-2):1–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01401149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Børgesen S. E., Gjerris F., Srensen S. C. The resistance to cerebrospinal fluid absorption in humans. A method of evaluation by lumbo-ventricular perfusion, with particular reference to normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. 1978 Jan;57(1):88–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1978.tb04500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conner E. S., Foley L., Black P. M. Experimental normal-pressure hydrocephalus is accompanied by increased transmantle pressure. J Neurosurg. 1984 Aug;61(2):322–327. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damasceno B. P., Carelli E. F., Honorato D. C., Facure J. J. The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid tap-test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1997 Jun;55(2):179–185. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x1997000200003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dauch W. A., Zimmermann R. Der Normaldruck-Hydrozephalus. Eine Bilanz 25 Jahre nach der Erstbeschreibung. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1990 May;58(5):178–190. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Rocco C., Di Trapani G., Pettorossi V. E., Caldarelli M. On the pathology of experimental hydrocephalus induced by artificial increase in endoventricular CSF pulse pressure. Childs Brain. 1979;5(2):81–95. doi: 10.1159/000119806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekstedt J. CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1977 Feb;40(2):105–119. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.40.2.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekstedt J. CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 2 . Normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Apr;41(4):345–353. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.4.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elble R. J., Hughes L., Higgins C. The syndrome of senile gait. J Neurol. 1992 Feb;239(2):71–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00862975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hakim S., Adams R. D. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci. 1965 Jul-Aug;2(4):307–327. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(65)90016-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayashi H., Tanaka K., Naruse H., Nishimura S., Hakuba A., Chokyu M. [Changes in dementia after shunt surgery for normal pressure hydrocephalus]. No To Shinkei. 1992 May;44(5):429–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hussey F., Schanzer B., Katzman R. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. II. Clinical studies. Neurology. 1970 Jul;20(7):665–680. doi: 10.1212/wnl.20.7.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katzman R. Dementias. Postgrad Med. 1978 Aug;64(2):119–125. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1978.11714904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Katzman R., Hussey F. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. I. Rationale and method. Neurology. 1970 Jun;20(6):534–544. doi: 10.1212/wnl.20.6.534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M., Tanaka A., Yoshinaga S. Significance of periventricular hemodynamics in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 1992 May;30(5):701–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Larsson A., Wikkelsö C., Bilting M., Stephensen H. Clinical parameters in 74 consecutive patients shunt operated for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. 1991 Dec;84(6):475–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb04998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Malm J., Kristensen B., Karlsson T., Fagerlund M., Elfverson J., Ekstedt J. The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with th idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol. 1995 Aug;52(8):783–789. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540320059013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Matsuda M., Nakasu S., Nakazawa T., Handa J. Cerebral hemodynamics in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlation between cerebral circulation time and dementia. Surg Neurol. 1990 Dec;34(6):396–401. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(90)90243-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nadeau S. E. Multi-infarct dementia, subcortical dementia, and hydrocephalus. South Med J. 1991 May;84(5 Suppl 1):S41–S52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ojemann R. G., Fisher C. M., Adams R. D., Sweet W. H., New P. F. Further experience with the syndrome of "normal" pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1969 Sep;31(3):279–294. doi: 10.3171/jns.1969.31.3.0279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheehan J. P., Polin R. S., Sheehan J. M., Baskaya M. K., Kassell N. F. Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1999 Nov;45(5):1120–1128. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199911000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Udvarhelyi G. B., Wood J. H., James A. E., Jr, Bartelt D. Results and complications in 55 shunted patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol. 1975 May;3(5):271–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wikkelsö C., Andersson H., Blomstrand C., Lindqvist G., Svendsen P. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Predictive value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap-test. Acta Neurol Scand. 1986 Jun;73(6):566–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1986.tb04601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wikkelsø C., Andersson H., Blomstrand C., Lindqvist G. The clinical effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;45(1):64–69. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.45.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES