Table 4.
Comparison of STM to competing clustering methods for clusters with 5 or more members
| Method | Number | Size | Discard(%) | Function | Location |
| STM | 60 | 40.1 | 7.8 | 13.7 | 7.42 |
| Maximal clique | 120 | 5.65 | 98.4 | 10.6 | 7.93 |
| Quasi clique | 103 | 11.2 | 80.8 | 11.5 | 6.58 |
| Samantha | 64 | 7.9 | 79.9 | 9.16 | 4.89 |
| Minimum cut | 114 | 13.5 | 35.0 | 8.36 | 4.75 |
| Bwtweenness cut | 180 | 10.26 | 21.0 | 8.19 | 4.18 |
| MCL | 163 | 9.79 | 36.7 | 8.18 | 3.97 |
Comparison of STM to competing clustering methods for the yeast protein-protein interaction data set for clusters with 5 or more members. The Number column indicates the number of clusters identified by each method, the Size column indicates the average number of proteins in each cluster; the Discard% indicates the percentage of proteins not assigned to any cluster. The -log p values for biological function and cellular location are shown.