Abstract
Objective: To examine (1) the extent to which cigarette companies fulfilled the promises made to consumers in the 1954 "Frank Statement", and (2) the effect of these promises on consumer knowledge, beliefs, and smoking practices.
Methods: This study reviews statements made since 1954 by the tobacco companies individually and collectively through the Tobacco Institute and Tobacco Industry Research Committee/Council for Tobacco Research on the subject of smoking as a cause disease, and the industry's pledge to support and disclose the results of impartial research on smoking and health. Many of the industry documents evaluated in this study were obtained from a collection consisting of 116 documents entitled the "Statement of Defendants' Misrepresentations" prepared by attorneys representing the state of Connecticut in the Medicaid litigation against the tobacco industry in 1998. In addition, we searched for corroborating material from tobacco industry documents collected from the tobacco industry's document websites. In order to contrast industry statements on smoking and health with what smokers' actually believed about smoking we reviewed reports of public polling data on smokers' knowledge and beliefs about smoking and disease gathered from tobacco industry sources and from surveys conducted by public health researchers.
Results: Analysis of public statements issued by the tobacco industry sources over the past five decades shows that the companies maintained the stance that smoking had not been proven to be injurious to health through 1999. The public statements of the tobacco industry are in sharp contrast to the private views expressed by many of their own scientists. The tobacco documents reveal that many scientists within the tobacco industry acknowledged as early as the 1950s that cigarette smoking was unsafe. The sincerity of the industry's promise to support research to find out if smoking was harmful to health and to disclose information about the health effects of smoking can also be questioned based upon the industry's own documents which reveal: (1) scepticism about the scientific value of the smoking and health research program established by the industry; and (2) evidence that research findings implicating smoking as a health problem were often not published or disclosed outside the industry. Industry documents also show that the companies knew that their own customers were misinformed about smoking and health issues.
Conclusion: It is clear that the cigarette companies failed to fulfill the promises made to consumers in the 1954 "Frank Statement" advertisement. The failure of cigarette manufacturers to honour these promises has resulted in a public that even today remains misinformed about the health risks of smoking.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (209.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ayanian J. Z., Cleary P. D. Perceived risks of heart disease and cancer among cigarette smokers. JAMA. 1999 Mar 17;281(11):1019–1021. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.11.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen J. B. Smokers' knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: health policy implications. Am J Public Health. 1996 Jan;86(1):18–24. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cummings K. M., Sciandra R., Gingrass A., Davis R. What scientists funded by the tobacco industry believe about the hazards of cigarette smoking. Am J Public Health. 1991 Jul;81(7):894–896. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.7.894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djordjevic M. V., Stellman S. D., Zang E. Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jan 19;92(2):106–111. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.2.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hastrup J. L., Cummings K. M., Swedrock T., Hyland A., Pauly J. L. Consumers' knowledge and beliefs about the safety of cigarette filters. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):84–84. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlowski L. T., O'Connor R. J. Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I40–I50. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leavell N. R. The low tar lie. Tob Control. 1999 Winter;8(4):433–437. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.4.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morley C. P., Cummings K. M., Hyland A., Giovino G. A., Horan J. K. Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I102–I109. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollay R. W., Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I18–I31. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoenbaum M. Do smokers understand the mortality effects of smoking? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey. Am J Public Health. 1997 May;87(5):755–759. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.5.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swedrock T. L., Hyland A., Hastrup J. L. Changes in the focus of cigarette advertisements in the 1950s. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):111–112. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]