Skip to main content
. 2000 Nov 28;97(25):13853–13858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250480397

Table 1.

Key statistical analyses of CFU in lung and spleen

Experiment Comparison Lung
Spleen
P(ANOVA) P(K-W) P(ANOVA) P(K-W)
1 Sham (9) vs. BCG Conn (8) <0.0001 0.0005 <0.0001 0.0015
BCG Conn (8) vs. rBCG30 Conn (8) NS NS 0.015 0.048
2 Sham (9) vs. BCG Conn (9) 0.0008 0.002 0.0004 0.001
BCG Conn (9) vs. rBCG30 Conn (9) 0.002 0.03 0.004 0.015
1 + 2 Sham (18) vs. BCG Conn (17) <0.0001 0.000002 <0.0001 0.000005
BCG Conn (17) vs. rBCG30 Conn (17) 0.01 0.01 0.0002 0.002
3 Sham (12) vs. BCG Conn (23) <0.0001 <0.000001 <0.0001 <0.000001
Sham (12) vs. BCG Tice (24) <0.0001 0.00006 <0.0001 0.00001
BCG Conn (23) vs. rBCG30 Conn (23) 0.085 0.03 0.004 0.005
BCG Tice (24) vs. rBCG30 Tice (24) 0.001 0.004 0.0009 0.003

Number of animals per group is shown in parentheses. NS, not significant.