Skip to main content
. 2002 Mar;87(3):210–215. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.3.210

Table 2.

Comparison between borderline and active myocarditis: instrumental data

Active Borderline
Electrocardiogram
    LBBB 2 (8%) 5 (31%)*
    Necrosis 2 (8%) 1 (6%)
    AV conduction disturbances 2 (8%) 0 (0%)
Echocardiogram
    LVEDV(ml/m2) 90 (42) 128 (50)***
    LVEF (%) 34 (12) 34 (15)
    M:V 1 (0) 0.8 (0.1)**
    P:ESV 2.21 (1.46) 1.7 (0.5)
Haemodynamic study
    CI (l/min/m2) 3 (0.7) 2.9 (1)
    PCWP (mm Hg) 10.6 (6.7) 9.85 (6.7)
    PAP 17 (7.4) 14.7 (7)

Data are mean (SD).

*p = 0.05; **p = 0.03; ***p = 0.002.

AV, atrioventricular; CI, cardiac index; LBBB, left bundle branch block; LVEDV, left ventricular end diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; M:V, mass to volume ratio; PAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; P:ESV, pressure end systolic volume ratio; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.