Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurotrauma. 2005 Dec;22(12):1485–1502. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1485

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Graph of skilled forelimb reaching (pre-injury criteria—post-injury) difference scores. Non-stimulated injured animals were significantly impaired on all test days compared to uninjured sham animals. VNS stimulated injured animals performed significantly more poorly than shams except on days 8 and 14 (^). In contrast with non-stimulated injured animals, VNS stimulation significantly improved reaching performance beginning at post-injury day 8–14 (*).