Table 2.
Factor loadings for the two-factor solution, following a varimax rotation
| Item | Factor 1 (NB) | Factor 2 (SC) | Subscale | Item-subscale correlation |
| 1 | 0.846 | 0.133 | NB | 0.773 |
| 2 | 0.811 | 0.288 | NB | 0.793 |
| 3 | 0.161 | 0.662 | SC | 0.549 |
| 4 | 0.399 | 0.671 | SC | 0.658 |
| 5 | 0.815 | 0.094 | NB | 0.713 |
| 6 | 0.315 | 0.653 | SC | 0.596 |
| 7 | 0.326 | 0.572 | SC | 0.535 |
| 8 | 0.091 | 0.707 | SC | 0.550 |
| 9 | 0.119 | 0.536 | SC | 0.403 |
| 10 | 0.778 | 0.232 | NB | 0.740 |
| 11 | 0.657 | 0.364 | NB | 0.662 |
| 12 | 0.058 | 0.584 | SC | 0.420 |
| 13 | 0.336 | 0.522 | SC | 0.478 |
| 14 | 0.679 | 0.481 | NB | 0.728 |
| 15 | 0.749 | 0.202 | NB | 0.695 |
Also shown in the table are the subscale allocations, with NB denoting the subscale labelled 'neighbourhood belonging' and SC referring to the 'social cohesion' items, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between each item and the sum of the other subscale items.