Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 22;5:127. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-127

Table 1.

Illustrating how the "Intention to treat" approach ascribing indeterminate treatment outcomes as failures overestimates the true failure rate. High failure rate:

Follow-up A (%) R = F(%) FITT (%) Overestimation of failure rate (%)
6 weeks 6 15 15.3 2%
8 weeks 20 25 26 4%
10 weeks 45 25 27.25 9%
12 weeks 68 25 28.4 14%
20 weeks 75 25 28.75 15%

Assume that the entomological inoculation rate is 1/month (Figure 4), the true failure rate (F) is 25%, and 5% of PCR pairs are indeterminate. The patients are censored when a recurrent infection occurs.

Then at 4 weeks follow-up in the trial, the recurrence rate = 3.5% (2.5% true recrudescence, 1% true recurrence)

True failure rate = 2.5%, ITT analysis failure rate = 2.55%, overestimation 1.275%. FITT (%) = A + 0.05 R

A – cumulative probability of developing a patent new infection

R – cumulative probability of developing a patent recrudescence