Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 22;5:127. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-127

Table 2.

Illustrating how the "Intention to treat" approach ascribing indeterminate treatment outcomes as failures overestimates the true failure rate. Low failure rate

Follow-up A (%) R = F(%) FITT (%) Overestimation of failure rate (%)
6 weeks 6 3 3.3 10%
8 weeks 20 5 6 20%
10 weeks 45 5 7.25 45%
12 weeks 68 5 8.4 68%
20 weeks 75 5 8.75 75%

If the failure rate is low (as it hopefully should be) the errors using the ITT approach are very large. In this example everything is the same as in the above example but now the true failure rate (F) is 5%,

A – cumulative probability of developing a patent new infection

R – cumulative probability of developing a patent recrudescence