Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(9-10):214–220. doi: 10.2119/2006-00037.Zheng

Table 1.

Hemodynamic variables and physiological parameters

Parameter Sham AMI + saline AMI + rAAV–GFP AMI + rAAV–CD151
n 8 6 6 7
BW, g 341.38 ± 11.61 344.83 ± 11.77 353.67 ± 19.44 343 ± 17.18
LVW, mg 721.3 ± 22.90 755 ± 15.17 746.7 ± 45.46 717.14 ± 22.15
HW, mg 853.25 ± 39.88 1075 ± 94.18 1086.67 ± 127.23 942.57 ± 56.21
LVW/BW, mg/g 2.11 ± 0.07 2.14 ± 0.05 2.13 ± 0.11 2.09 ± 0.07
HW/BW, mg/g 2.50 ± 0.11 3.08 ± 0.29* 3.07 ± 0.25* 2.75 ± 0.08
LVEDP, mmHg 3.51 ± 0.61 23.27 ± 2.42* 23.3 ± 3.26* 4.89 ± 8.81
LVESP, mmHg 135.66 ± 2.00 113.5 ± 3.54* 115.20 ± 2.26* 126.11 ± 2.64
+dp/dtmax, mmHg/s 7400.75 ± 129.27 3522.33 ± 307.66* 3713 ± 195.53* 6073.29 ± 407.96
dp/dtmax, mmHg/s 4417.13 ± 142.75 3764.83 ± 99.91* 3710.83 ± 170.10* 3992.29 ± 120.60

At 4 weeks after coronary artery ligation, hemodynamic variables were monitored using a catheter tip manometer advanced from the right carotid artery via the aortic arch into the left ventricle at the end of the experiment. Data represent means ± SEM. BW, body weight; HW, heart weight; LVW, left ventricular weight; LVEDP, left ventricle end–diastolic pressure; LVESP, left ventricle end–systolic pressure; ±dp/dtmax, maximal rate of increase and decline in left ventricular pressure.

*

P < 0. 05 vs. sham;

P < 0.05 vs. sham, AMI + saline, and AMI + rAAV–GFP.