Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov;57(11):1208–1212. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.018648

Table 2.

 Qualitative comparison of cytocentrifugation and Cytyc Thinprep methods (0–3 scale, paired series)

Criteria tested N Cytocentrifugation Cytyc Thinprep LBC p Value
TPX reusable chamber 44
    Cellularity 1.42 (0.65) 1.68 (0.58) <0.001
    Fixation 1.87 (0.70) 2.38 (0.52) <0.00001
    RBC 0.22 (0.39) 0.05 (0.15) <0.001
    Leucocytes 0.31 (0.38) 0.51 (0.49) <0.02
    Cell groups 0.36 (0.64) 0.40 (0.62) NS
    Atypias 0.69 (1.39) 0.77 (1.57) NS
    Positive (%) 6/44 (13.6%) 6/44 (13.6%) NS
Disposable Cytofunnel 90
    Cellularity 1.79 (0.43) 1.56 (0.48) <0.01
    Fixation 2.12 (0.63) 2.54 (0.44) <0.0001
    RBC 0.45 (0.46) 0.06 (0.21) <0.00001
    Leucocytes 0.61 (0.63) 0.61 (0.90) NS
    Cell groups 0.25 (0.39) 0.22 (0.39) NS
    Atypias 0.85 (1.63) 0.72 (1.40) NS
    Positive (%) 3/31 (6.5%) 3/31 (6.5%) NS
Disposable Megafunnel* 90
    Cellularity 1.85 (0.78) 1.69 (0.69) NS
    Fixation 2.17 (0.67) 2.74 (0.35) <0.00001
    RBC 0.50 (0.76) 0.04 (0.14) <0.001
    Leucocytes 0.83 (0.77) 0.45 (0.51) <0.00001
    Cell groups 0.16 (0.42) 0.20 (0.35) NS
    Atypias 0.82 (2.02) 0.77 (1.91) NS
    Positive (%) 3/31 (6.5%) 3/31 (6.5%) NS

Values are mean (SD).

LBC, liquid based cytology; NS, not significant; RBC, red blood cells.