Skip to main content
. 2002 Nov;86(11):1200–1206. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.11.1200

Table 5.

Relation between myopia and reported near work

Africans (n = 2258) Non-Africans (n = 253)
Near work (hours per week) Non-myopic median (n = 2151) Myopic median (n = 107) p Value* Quality control kappa†‡ (n = 217) Non-myopic median (n = 219) Myopic median (n = 34) p Value* Quality control kappa†‡ (n = 17)
(1) Reading for pleasure
    term 2 2 0.312 0.56 3 4.5 0.017 0.73
    holidays 3 3 0.978 0.53 3 7 0.014 0.73
    term and holidays§ 2.3 2 0.362 0.57 3 5.5 0.010 0.73
    last week (term time) 2 2 0.436 0.62 2 2 0.086 0.90
(2) Studying
    term 20 20 0.624 0.53 14 14 0.984 0.69
    holidays 15 14 0.110 0.39 8 7 0.387 0.64
    term and holidays§ 18.5 18 0.381 0.47 12 12 0.665 0.62
    last week (term time) 18 15 0.438 0.36 12 10.5 0.456 0.65
(3) Reading for pleasure and studying 21.8 20.8 0.344 0.34 15.8 17.5 0.540 0.35
(4) Television
    term 3 3 0.384 0.50 7 8 0.521 0.56
    holidays 5 5 0.674 0.48 14 11.5 0.799 0.72
    last week (term) 3 0.628 0.48 5 6.5 0.351 0.68
(5) Computer
    term <1 <1 0.463 0.45 1 2 0.080 1.00
    holidays <1 <1 0.586 0.62 2 3 0.120 0.81
    last week (term) <1 <1 0.340 0.35 1 1 0.232 1.00
(6) Sewing
    term <1 <1 0.331 −0.01 <1 <1 0.869 1.00
    holidays <1 <1 0.168 0.44 <1 <1 0.778 1.00
    last week (term) <1 <1 0.178 −0.01 <1 <1 0.422 1.00

*Wilcoxon’s rank sum test for two unpaired samples.

†Grouped in intervals of 5 hours, except for the sewing variables which were grouped in intervals of 4 hours (to avoid all values being in the same group).

‡Interpretation of kappa values: ≤0.20 = poor agreement, 0.21−0.40 = fair agreement, 0.41−0.60 = moderate agreement, 0.61−0.80 = good agreement, 0.81−1.00 very good agreement (13).

§Term: holidays weighted 3:1.

¶N=106.