Skip to main content
. 2003 Sep;87(9):1159–1166. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.9.1159

Table 2.

p Values* for comparison of GFAP immunoreactivity† between different histopathological groups for the three regions analysed

Comparison groups§ Region¥ Immunolabelling intensity Immunolabelling area
Drusen v YN Inner retina 0.0036 0.002
Outer retina NS NS
Total 0.0022 0.0018
Drusen v AN Inner retina 0.0298 0.0139
Outer retina NS NS
Total 0.0179 0.0104
GA v YN Inner retina NS 0.0397
Outer retina 0.0573¶ 0.0341
Total 0.0397 0.0207
GA v AN Inner retina NS NS
Outer retina 0.0619¶ 0.0368
Total 0.0692¶ 0.0449
GA v Drusen Inner retina NS NS
Outer retina 0.0359 0.0267
Total NS NS
AN v YN Inner retina NS NS
Outer retina NS NS
Total NS 0.0383

*p Values obtained using the Student’s t test. NS = not significant (p>0.05) by both Student’s t test and ANOVA with Student-Newmann-Keuls post hoc test.

¶ = significant (p<0.05) by ANOVA with Student-Newmann-Keuls post hoc test.

†GFAP immunoreactivity assessed for two parameters: Immunolabelling intensity (total fluorescence intensity and area (sum of particle analyses of fields labelled).

§Comparisons made between AMD (drusen and GA, geographic atrophy) and controls (AN, aged normal and YN, young normal); also between AN and YN.

¥Three regions of GFAP expression: inner retina (within NFL/GCL); outer retina (OLM to IPL/INL); total = inner retina + outer retina.