Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov;88(11):1443–1449. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.037457

Table 2.

 Demographic and visual function characteristics of participants at baseline

CLVR (n = 76) ELVR (n = 75) CELVR (n = 75)
Median (n) Q1–Q3 (%) Median (n) Q1–Q3 (%) Median (n) Q1–Q3 (%)
Age (years) 81 77–84 80 76–85 83 78–86
Female 48 63% 48 64% 54 72%
Registered as blind or partially sighted:
    Registered blind 15 20% 9 12% 5 7%
    Registered partially sighted 21 28% 17 23% 19 25%
    Not registered blind 29 38% 32 43% 38 51%
    Registration status not known 11 14% 17 23% 13 17%
Home circumstances:
    Living alone 32 42% 39 52% 45 60%
    Living with spouse 40 53% 21 28% 26 35%
    Living with family 4 5% 15 20% 4 5%
Finished education ⩽14 years 57 75% 50 67% 53 71%
Distance visual acuity (logMAR)† 0.81 0.48–1.00 0.90 0.56–1.08 0.62 0.44–1.00
Continuous text reading acuity (M units)‡ 2.00 1.15–4.00 2.50 1.00–5.00 1.60 1.00–2.50
Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity§ 0.90 0.60–1.05 0.83 0.45–1.05 1.00 0.60–1.05

†Distance visual acuity data were missing for four patients allocated to CLVR, two allocated to ELVR, and four allocated to CELVR.

‡Continuous text reading acuity data were missing for three patients allocated to CLVR, seven allocated to ELVR, and six allocated to CELVR.

§Contrast sensitivity data were missing for 20 patients allocated to CLVR, 17 allocated to ELVR, and 14 allocated to CELVR.

Data were missing because optometrists carrying out the low vision assessments sometimes failed to obtain or record the information, not because patients refused or were unable to perform the task.