Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov;88(11):1387–1390. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.045609

Table 1.

 Clinical findings in IOL group

Patient No Age at surgery (weeks) Age at optotype acuity testing (years) Type of IOL IOL power (D) Re-operations Last refractive error (D) Optotype acuity Patching
Pseudophakic Phakic Pseudophakic Phakic
1 3 3.3 Pharmacia 811A 28.0 Trabeculectomy +0.25 plano 20/40 20/20 Fair
2 4 4.3 AcrySof MA30 28.5 Membranectomy +3.50 +1.50 20/25 20/20 Good
3 4 3.7 AcrySof MA30 24.0 Membranectomy ×2 −8.00 +2.50 CF* 20/30 Poor
4 5 4.2 AcrySof MA30 29.0 Baerveldt implant 2nd IOL IOL exchange −0.75 plano CF 20/30 N/A
5 8 Lost to follow up
6 11 5.4 Pharmacia 811A 27.0 Strabismus × 3† Membranectomy −1.00+1.75×90 +1.00+1.00×90 20/70 20/30 Excellent
7 13 3.3 Pharmacia 811A 30.0 Membranectomy −3.50 –0.50 NA‡ NA Poor
8 16 4.7 AcrySof MA60 25.0 Membranectomy +2.75 plano 20/200 20/20 Fair
9 16 Lost to follow up
10 17 4.3 Pharmacia 912 26.0 Strabismus Membranectomy −5.00+1.50×180 +1.75 20/200 20/30 Good
11 19 4.2 AcrySof MA30 26.5 Strabismus Membranectomy +2.00 +1.00+3.00×96 20/400 20/20 Good
12 22 4.7 Pharmacia 811A 27.5 Strabismus +0.75+1.25×120 +1.25 CF 20/25 Poor

*Eye has optic nerve coloboma and macular abnormality and should not have been enrolled in original study.

†First strabismus surgery combined with membranectomy.

‡Child has severe developmental delay, but “sees well” in both eyes.