Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar;89(3):261–265. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.051862

Table 3.

 Details of included studies

No Article Target condition Index test Reference standard Total numberof participants
1 Wadood et al Glaucoma FDT, TOP, and SAP Stereoscopic disc analysis 98
2 Kesen et al Glaucoma HRT Clinical impression 200
3 Lin et al Diabetic retinopathy screening Single field non-mydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography Standardised mydriatic colour photography or ophthalmoscopy 197
4 Iwasaki et al Glaucoma screening FDT SAP, Octopus and clinical 14, 814
5 Williams et al Glaucoma OCT SAP or FDT 276
6 Kowalski et al HSV ocular disease ELVIS Cell culture and Herp check 483
7 Funaki et al Glaucoma SLP SAP 184
8 Stanford et al Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis Retinal photography None 96
9 Greany et al Glaucoma ODP, CLSO, SLP, OCT SAP 89
10 Wall et al Neuro-ophthalmic disorders FDT SAP and clinical diagnosis 139
11 Rudinsky et al CSMO High resolution digital fundus photography Contact lens biomicroscopy 120
12 Soliman et al Glaucoma SWAP and FDT SAP and clinical 123
13 Fransen et al Diabetic Retinopathy Inoveon’s DR-3DT system DRS7 photography 290
14 Budenz et al Glaucoma SAP (SITA) SAP (FT) 172
15 Bayer et al Glaucoma SWAP, FDT, and PERG SAP 72
16 Rao et al Keratoconus ORBSCAN II indices VKG indices 110

FDT, frequency doubling technology, TOP, tendency oriented perimetry, SAP, standard automated perimetry (SAP-SITA, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm; SAP-FT, full threshold perimetry) HRT, Heidelberg retinal tomograph, OCT, optical coherence tomography, ODP, optic disc pictures, CLSO, confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope, SLP, scanning laser polarimetry, CSMO, clinically significant macular oedema, SWAP, short wavelength automated perimetry, PERG, pattern electroretinogram