Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar;89(3):321–326. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.046391

Table 1.

 Baseline data of the patients of the study group and the control group

Study group (n = 97) Control group (n = 69) p Value*
Age (years) 67.2 (9.9) 66.7 (8.6) 0.56 (NS)
Median 67.5 67.8
Range 28.2–86.7 49.1–87.5
Refractive error (D) 0.61 (1.55) 0.69 (1.43) 0.60 (NS)
Median +0.50 +0.63
Range −2.5 to +5.25 −3.75 to +5.75
Visual acuity
Snellen acuity 0.14 (0.09) 0.31 (0.16) <0.001
    Median 0.10 0.30
    Range FC–0.50 0.03–0.60
Snellen lines 13.3 (3.2) 17.1 (2.9) <0.001
    Median 13 18
    Range 4–20 8–21
LogMar 0.98 (0.36) 0.59 (0.52) <0.001
    Median 1.00 0.53
    Range 0.30–2.40 0.22–1.52
Follow up 9.2 (6.8) 7.4 (4.5) 0.30 (NS)
    Median 7.0 6.9
    Range 1.0–25.2 1.2–23.1
Intraocular pressure 15.2 (3.6) 15.5 (3.6) 0.85 (NS)
    Median 16 16
    Range 10–24 9–24
Change in best VA
    LogMar units −0.27 (0.24) 0.03 (0.21) <0.001
    Snellen lines 2.6 (2.2) −0.3 (1.9) <0.001
    Snellen acuity 0.12 (0.13) −0.02 (0.120 <0.001
Change in VA between baseline and end of follow up
    LogMar units −0.03 (0.33) 0.13 (0.23) <0.001
    Snellen lines 0.4 (3.3) −1.3 (2.3) <0.001
    Snellen acuity 0.03 (0.13) −0.07 (0.12) <0.001

*Statistical significance of difference between the two groups.

NS, statistically not significant; VA, visual acuity. Results shown as mean (standard deviation).