Table 4.
Key similarities in the two community programmes
| Factor | Advantage |
| Decision to do surgery made on site | Patient avoids several trips through referral system |
| Examiner at site has enough training to differentiate causes of visual impairment | Allows accurate counselling in the field and avoids transporting patients with inoperable diseases |
| Patient transported to hospital the same day as diagnosis | Takes advantage of presumed willingness to act at the time |
| Patients transported to and from hospital | Overcomes a number of barriers including cost of transport, reluctance to make journey to unfamiliar place, need for patient to bring a companion |
| Team includes a dedicated counsellor | Patient and family have a chance for questions to be answered at length by non-threatening personnel |
| No hidden charges (packaged deal) | Patients know exactly how much they will pay for round trip transport, food, accommodation, surgery with IOL, preoperative and postoperative medicines, and follow up |
| No fee for examination at site | Encourages patients to attend |
| Fixed sites are visited regularly and never cancelled once advertisement has gone out | Community and patients develop trust in the service |
| Community programmes are closely coordinated with hospital services | Hospitals are aware of and can plan to cope with periodic influxes of patients |