Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov;89(11):1495–1499. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075077

Table 1.

 Evaluation by students (n = 172) of the presentation using a questionnaire, scale from “fully agree” (1) to “disagree” (4)

Criteria 3D group (n = 90) Control group (n = 82) p Value
Mean (range) Mean (range)
Satisfaction with the presentation 1.2 (1–3) 1.3 (1–4) 0.14
Useful learning aid 1.4 (1–3) 1.6 (1–4) 0.02
Intelligibility for cataract surgery 1.7 (1–3) 1.7 (1–3) 0.69
Intelligibility for glaucoma surgery 1.6 (1–3) 1.8 (1–3) 0.03
Improvement of spatial ability 1.4 (1–3) 1.7 (1–4) 0.01