Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;89(12):1576–1580. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.077164

Table 2.

 Profile and clinical characteristics of patients with unilateral ERM

Case No Sex Age (years) Symptoms Ocular history Affected eye Unaffected eye
Refraction (D) VA Refraction (D) VA
1 M 79 Macropsia Bilateral pseudophakia +1.75/−2.25×076 0 Plano/−1×026 −0.1
2 M 67 Blurred vision Nil of note +2.00 sphere +0.5 +2.25 sphere +0.1
Rivalry Add +1.75 Add +1.75
3 F 73 Objects looked further away, diplopia watching TV Pseudophakia in unaffected eye −1.75/−1.25×076 Add +2.5 +0.5 −1.50 D sphere Add +2.75 D +0.1
4 F 78 Blurred vision, difficulty reading Nil of note −2.50 D sphere +0.1 −1.50 D sphere 0
Add +1.75 add +2.00
5 M 83 Blurred vision Bilateral pseudophakia −1.75/−1.50×105 0 Plano/−0.50×026 0
Add +2.50 Add +2.50
6 F 79 Photophobia Nil of note +5.00 D/−0.50×100 +0.5 +5.50 D/−1.00×100 +0.2
Add +1.25 Add +1.50
7 M 61 Blurred vision Nil of note Plano/−3.25×023 +0.3 +0.50/−3.00×167 -0.1
Add +2.50 Add +2.50
8 F 84 Blurred vision Bilateral pseudophakia +0.50/−1.00×155 +0.5 Plano/−1.50×111 +0.3
9 M 65 Difficulty judging distances Nil of note −0.50/−0.50×069 +0.3 Plano/−1.25×180 0
Add +1.50 Add +1.50
10 F 71 Rivalry, occipital headache Bilateral pseudophakia +0.25/−0.50×026 +0.1 Plano/−1.00×175 0
Add +2.00 D Add +2.00 D
11 M 45 Asthenopia, poor stereopsis, reading difficulties Cystoid macular oedema post- phaco, affected eye Plano/−1.25×096 −0.2 Plano/−0.50×070 −0.1
12 M 72 Binocular diplopia, difficulty reading Nil of note Plano/−1.00×083 +0.1 +0.75/−2.00×077 −0.1
Add +2.00 Add +2.00
13 M 36 Rivalry Buckle and cryopexy in affected eye Plano −0.1 Plano −0.1
14 M 54 Poor stereopsis Nil of note −3.00/−0.75×089 −0.1 −3.25/−0.50×106 −0.1
Mean (SD) 67.7 (14.36) 0.18 (0.25) 0 (0.13)

VA, logMAR visual acuity.