Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;89(12):1576–1580. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.077164

Table 3.

 Assessment of agreement between repeated measurements of horizontal (A) and vertical (B) threshold aniseikonia

1st reading 2nd reading Difference between readings Coefficient of repeatability
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
(A) Induced horizontal aniseikonia with size lenses
−9% −8.4 (1.10) −7.8 (0.54) 1 (0.53) 1.05
−5% −4.5 (0.47) −4.7 (0.42) 0.3 (0.42) 0.84
0% −0.2 (0.59) −0.05 (0.55) 0.5 (0.53) 1.05
5% 4.0 (0.71) 4.3 (0.63) 0.5 (0.41) 0.82
9% 8.0 (1.07) 8.1 (0.96) 0.6 (0.52) 1.03
Mean (SD) 0.58 (0.519) 1.03 (0.119)
(B) Induced vertical aniseikonia with size lenses
−9% −7.8 (1.14) −7.9 (0.85) 0.7 (0.53) 1.06
−5% −4.6 (0.83) −4.7 (0.42) 0.3 (0.42) 0.88
0% 0.1 (0.62) 0.3 (0.43) 0.45 (0.37) 0.74
5% 4.7 (1.13) 4.5 (1.10) 0.5 (0.41) 0.82
9% 8.1 (0.70) 7.8 (0.48) 0.8 (0.42) 0.84
Mean (SD) 0.57 (0.440) 0.84 (0.119)

N, 10.

Two readings were taken on 10 subjects in the control group (Nos 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15) with a 2 week interval. Induced aniseikonia with size lenses, magnification (m): −9%, −5%, 0%, 5%, 9%.