Skip to main content
. 2002 May;50(5):724–729. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.5.724

Table 4.

Other specialised procedures included in the basic training programme

Country %US No of US %Rad %Proct %OM No of OM %pHM No of pHM %Breath %Biopsy
B 40 1750 40 40 20 50 40 35 20 20
D 0 60 20 20 25 20 200 40 60
E 0 75 12.5 37.5 92 50 99 25 50
F 80 452 60 20 20 150 20 60 0 20
G 100 370 100 40 60 73 60 63 0 20
I 80 2666 60 20 40 105 60 65 40 60
S 80 97 40 40 40 20 40 112 40 40

%US, percentage of assistants trained in abdominal ultrasound.

No of US, average number of abdominal ultrasounds.

%Rad, percentage of assistants receiving regular teaching in radiology.

%Proct, percentage of assistants receiving adequate training in proctology.

%OM, percentage of assistants trained in oesophageal manometry.

No of OM, average number of oesophageal manometries performed by the assistant.

%pHM, percentage of assistants trained in 24 hour pH metry.

No of pHM, average number of 24 hour pH metries performed by an assistant.

%Breath, percentage of assistants trained in interpretation of breath tests.

%Biopsy, percentage of assistants trained in interpretation of biopsy specimens.

B, Belgium; D, Denmark; E, UK; F, France; G, Germany; I, Italy; S, Spain.