Table 4.
Country | %US | No of US | %Rad | %Proct | %OM | No of OM | %pHM | No of pHM | %Breath | %Biopsy |
B | 40 | 1750 | 40 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 40 | 35 | 20 | 20 |
D | 0 | — | 60 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 200 | 40 | 60 |
E | 0 | — | 75 | 12.5 | 37.5 | 92 | 50 | 99 | 25 | 50 |
F | 80 | 452 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 150 | 20 | 60 | 0 | 20 |
G | 100 | 370 | 100 | 40 | 60 | 73 | 60 | 63 | 0 | 20 |
I | 80 | 2666 | 60 | 20 | 40 | 105 | 60 | 65 | 40 | 60 |
S | 80 | 97 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 20 | 40 | 112 | 40 | 40 |
%US, percentage of assistants trained in abdominal ultrasound.
No of US, average number of abdominal ultrasounds.
%Rad, percentage of assistants receiving regular teaching in radiology.
%Proct, percentage of assistants receiving adequate training in proctology.
%OM, percentage of assistants trained in oesophageal manometry.
No of OM, average number of oesophageal manometries performed by the assistant.
%pHM, percentage of assistants trained in 24 hour pH metry.
No of pHM, average number of 24 hour pH metries performed by an assistant.
%Breath, percentage of assistants trained in interpretation of breath tests.
%Biopsy, percentage of assistants trained in interpretation of biopsy specimens.
B, Belgium; D, Denmark; E, UK; F, France; G, Germany; I, Italy; S, Spain.