Table 1 .
Subjective impression of image quality of the gastric fundus on multi-detector row CT angiograms, as assigned by the three readers
| Subjective impression of image quality of gastric fundus (grade)* |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total | |
| Reader | ||||||
| No 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 22 |
| No 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 22 |
| No 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 22 |
*Grade 1, unacceptable (diagnostic information not obtained); grade 2, poor (poor differentiation of details of the gastric fundus including gastric fundus lumen, gastric fundus wall, and perigastric space); grade 3, fair (fair differentiation of details of the gastric fundus); grade 4, good (good differentiation of details of the gastric fundus); and grade 5, excellent image quality (excellent differentiation of details of the gastric fundus).