Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul;52(7):988–997. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.7.988

Table 3.

Effect of ST/LA on adhesion† of EIEC to Caco-2 cell monolayers

Time after EIEC addition (h)
Probiotic treatment Ratio of MOI‡ (ST/LA:EIEC) 1 2 3 Significance
None N/A 24 (3) 27 (1) 17 (5)
Live ST/LA 1 h prior to EIEC 2:1 6 (2) 5 (1) 5 (2) **
20:1 2 (1) 1 (1) 0 ***
200:1 1 (1) 0 0 ***
Live ST/LA simultaneous with EIEC 2:1 19 (4) 21 (4) 24 (3) NS
20:1 15 (3) 17 (2) 11 (5) NS
200:1 5 (1) 7 (3) 5 (1) **
Live ST/LA 1 h after EIEC 2:1 22 (5) 29 (3) 25 (2) NS
20:1 20 (4) 23 (1) 22 (3) NS
200:1 21 (5) 22 (2) 23 (1) NS
ST/LA (antibiotic killed) 1 h prior to EIEC 2:1 10 (2) 9 (1) 10 (1) **
20:1 7 (1) 7 (1) 8 (1) **
200:1 3 (1) 3 (2) 3 (1) **
ST/LA (antibiotic killed) simultaneous with EIEC 2:1 18 (2) 19 (1) 18 (1) *
20:1 16 (1) 16 (2) 15 (1) *
200:1 5 (1) 7 (2) 5 (1) **
ST/LA (heat inactivated) 1 h prior to EIEC 2:1 22 (1) 25 (2) 23 (2) NS
20:1 20 (1) 23 (1) 20 (1) NS
200:1 21 (2) 20 (2) 20 (1) NS
ST/LA sp medium§ simultaneous with EIEC 25 (2) 23 (2) 22 (1) NS

†Mean (SEM) of adherent EIEC per 100 cells examined in 20 random microscopic fields, for four experiments in duplicate.

‡MOI=multiplicity of infection. EIEC was applied at 50:1 throughout.

§ST/LA spent medium from 48 hour cultures was filtered, lyophilised, and concentrated 10×.

*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, data sets significantly different from EIEC with no probiotics (by repeated measures ANOVA).

ST/LA, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus acidophilus; EIEC, enteroinvasive Escherichia coli.