Table 4.
Collagen production (102 dpm hydroxy (3H) proline/mg collagen) (collagen type production as % of total collagen production) | |||
Collagen I | Collagen III | Collagen V | |
Control group | 1300 (180) | 290 (40) | 80 (10) |
% of total collagen | 77.8 (10.4) | 17.4 (2.4) | 4.8 (0.6) |
CD group | 3840 (580)*** | 1800 (280)*** | 390 (60)*** |
% of total collagen | 63.6 (9.6) | 29.8 (4.6)* | 6.4 (0.9) |
CD group+RG1503 | 2260 (360)*† | 430 (70)††† | 260 (50)**† |
% of total collagen | 76.6 (11.5) | 14.6 (1.9)†† | 8.8 (1.5)* |
CD group+RG1192 | 3750 (450)*** | 690 (100)**†† | 230 (40)**† |
% of total collagen | 79.9 (13.2) | 14.8 (2.2)†† | 5.2 (0.7) |
CD-GC group | 2430 (370)* | 910 (140)** | 240 (40)** |
% of total collagen | 67.9 (10.3) | 25.4 (3.8) | 6.8 (1.0) |
CD-GC group+RG1503 | 1900 (280) | 230 (40)‡‡‡ | 160 (30)* |
% of total collagen | 82.9 (12.5) | 10.9 (1.7)‡‡ | 6.9 (1.1) |
CD-GC group+RG1192 | 2330 (350)* | 440 (80)‡‡ | 100 (20)‡‡ |
% of total collagen | 81.1 (11.7) | 3.4 (0.5) | 15.5 (3.0)‡ |
Control, CD, and CD-GC groups as described in table 1 ▶.
RGTA treatment of normal intestinal tissue (control group) did not significantly change collagen type production (data not shown). The percentage of collagen type production compared with total collagen production was calculated from absolute values.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 compared with the control group.
†p<0.05, ††p<0.01, †††p<0.001 between RGTA treatment and no RGTA treatment of specimens from the CD group.
‡p<0.05, ‡‡p<0.01, ‡‡‡p<0.001 between RGTA treatment and no RGTA treatment of specimens from the CD-GC group.