Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;54(4):546–555. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.047696

Table 2.

 Criteria for measuring agreement between endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the internal and external anal sphincters

Level of agreement Criteria
Complete agreement Normal appearance versus mild focal thinning
Similar findings* within two hours on the clock face
Similar findings* located at the same or within one craniocaudal level
Acceptable agreement Marked focal thinning versus tear
Marked focal thinning versus scar
Atrophy alone versus atrophy with tear versus atrophy with scar
Similar findings* separated by ⩾ one craniocaudal level
Similar findings* separated by > 2 hours on the clock face
Disagreement Any other combination not listed above

*For external sphincter, similar findings indicates tear or scar by MRI versus defect by ultrasound.